Center for Health Systems Research. National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
National School of Nursing and Obstetrics. National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020433. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020433.
Over the last two decades, the Mexican government has released several efforts to achieve universal health coverage (UHC), based on the principles of fairness and social protection, to reduce the inequities in utilization, access, and quality of care existing in the health system. Two of the most important social public policies that have targeted the population without access to social security include the 1997 conditional cash transfers (CCT) program known as Prospera (formerly Oportunidades or Progresa) and the Seguro Popular de Salud (SPS by its Spanish initials), launched in 2003. These two programs, so far, have survived changes in the federal administrations being the most longstanding social programs targeting poor (or unprotected) populations ever in the history of modern Mexico. We tested the existence of positive synergies between demand-side (or CCT-Prospera) and supply-side (or Seguro Popular de Salud, SPS) social programs in the achievement of effective coverage (EC) of maternal-child health interventions in Mexico.
We performed a retrospective-cohort analysis to 6413 women aged 12-49 years who participated in a probabilistic survey conducted in 2012. We calculated EC as the product of three indexes: need, utilization and quality of health care. Correlates of EC were identified estimating a logistic regression model. We also presented adjusted EC by specific women groups.
EC among beneficiaries of both programs was similar to estimates in Social Security affiliates (54%). For those not affiliated to any of the programs or those who received benefits for only one of them, the EC was 47.6% and 45.5% respectively. Adjusted estimates of EC suggest that overall, having both programs (Prospera + SPS) has a positive effect on maternal and child care coverage, which makes the observed differences in EC not statistically significant between those affiliated to both programs in comparison with the observed in the population with social security.
Results support positive synergies between Prospera and SPS in the reduction of the gaps in EC. The most vulnerable population groups need to be reached by the combination of these programs so that public health efforts translate into greater EC of maternal health services and better maternal-child outcomes.
在过去的二十年里,墨西哥政府基于公平和社会保护原则,发布了多项实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)的努力,以减少医疗体系中存在的利用、获得和护理质量方面的不平等。针对没有社会保障的人群的两项最重要的社会公共政策是 1997 年的有条件现金转移(CCT)计划,称为 Prospera(前身为 Oportunidades 或 Progresa)和 2003 年推出的 Seguro Popular de Salud(SPS,首字母缩写)。到目前为止,这两个项目在联邦政府更迭的情况下得以幸存,是现代墨西哥历史上针对贫困(或无保障)人群的最持久的社会项目。我们检验了需求方(或 CCT-Prospera)和供应方(或 Seguro Popular de Salud,SPS)社会项目在实现墨西哥母婴健康干预有效覆盖(EC)方面的积极协同作用。
我们对 2012 年进行的一项概率调查中 6413 名 12-49 岁的妇女进行了回顾性队列分析。我们将 EC 定义为三个指标的乘积:需求、利用和医疗保健质量。通过估计逻辑回归模型确定 EC 的相关因素。我们还展示了按特定妇女群体调整的 EC。
两个项目的受益人的 EC 与社会保障附属机构的估计值相似(54%)。对于那些不属于任何一个项目的人,或者只受益于其中一个项目的人,EC 分别为 47.6%和 45.5%。EC 的调整估计表明,总体而言,同时拥有这两个项目(Prospera+SPS)对母婴保健覆盖有积极影响,这使得在那些同时参加这两个项目的人与参加社会保障的人之间,EC 的差异在统计学上没有显著意义。
结果支持 Prospera 和 SPS 之间在缩小 EC 差距方面的积极协同作用。最脆弱的人群群体需要通过这些项目的组合来覆盖,以便公共卫生工作转化为更大的母婴保健服务 EC 和更好的母婴结果。