van Kampen Dirk
Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2009 Dec 8;5:9-21. doi: 10.2174/1745017900905010009.
The principal aim of this paper is to investigate whether it is possible to create a personality taxonomy of clinical relevance out of Eysenck's original PEN model by repairing the various shortcomings that can be noted in Eysenck's personality theory, particularly in relation to P or Psychoticism. Addressing three approaches that have been followed to answer the question 'which personality factors are basic?', arguments are listed to show that particularly the theory-informed approach, originally defended by Eysenck, may lead to scientific progress. However, also noting the many deficiencies in the nomological network surrounding P, the peculiar situation arises that we adhere to Eysenck's theory-informed methodology, but criticize his theory. These arguments and criticisms led to the replacement of P by three orthogonal and theory-based factors, Insensitivity (S), Orderliness (G), and Absorption (A), that together with the dimensions E or Extraversion and N or Neuroticism, that were retained from Eysenck's PEN model, appear to give a comprehensive account of the main vulnerability factors in schizophrenia and affective disorders, as well as in other psychopathological conditions.
本文的主要目的是研究能否通过修复艾森克人格理论中,尤其是与P维度或精神质相关的各种缺陷,从艾森克最初的PEN模型中创建一个具有临床相关性的人格分类法。针对为回答“哪些人格因素是基本的?”这一问题所采用的三种方法,列出了相关论据,以表明特别是艾森克最初所捍卫的理论导向方法,可能会带来科学进步。然而,也注意到围绕P维度的法则网络存在许多缺陷,于是出现了一种特殊情况,即我们坚持艾森克的理论导向方法,但却对他的理论提出批评。这些论据和批评导致用三个正交的、基于理论的因素,即麻木不仁(S)、有条理(G)和专注(A)取代了P维度,它们与从艾森克的PEN模型中保留下来的外向性(E)维度和神经质(N)维度一起,似乎全面地解释了精神分裂症和情感障碍以及其他精神病理状况中的主要易患因素。