• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子病历以及与患者和其他临床医生的沟通:我们交流得更少了吗?

Electronic medical records and communication with patients and other clinicians: are we talking less?

作者信息

O'Malley Ann S, Cohen Genna R, Grossman Joy M

出版信息

Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010 Apr(131):1--4.

PMID:20499485
Abstract

Commercial electronic medical records (EMRs) both help and hinder physician interpersonal communication--real-time, face-to-face or phone conversations--with patients and other clinicians, according to a new Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) study based on in-depth interviews with clinicians in 26 physician practices. EMRs assist real-time communication with patients during office visits, primarily through immediate access to patient information, allowing clinicians to talk with patients rather than search for information from paper records. For some clinicians, however, aspects of EMRs pose a distraction during visits. Moreover, some indicated that clinicians may rely on EMRs for information gathering and transfer at the expense of real-time communication with patients and other clinicians. Given time pressures already present in many physician practices, EMR and office-work flow modifications could help ensure that EMRs advance care without compromising interpersonal communication. In particular, policies promoting EMR adoption should consider incorporating communication-skills training for medical trainees and clinicians using EMRs.

摘要

根据医疗系统变革研究中心(HSC)的一项新研究,该研究基于对26家医师诊所的临床医生进行的深入访谈,商业电子病历(EMR)对医生与患者及其他临床医生之间的人际沟通——实时、面对面或电话交谈——既有帮助也有阻碍。电子病历有助于在门诊期间与患者进行实时沟通,主要是通过即时获取患者信息,使临床医生能够与患者交谈,而不必从纸质记录中查找信息。然而,对于一些临床医生来说,电子病历的某些方面在门诊期间会造成干扰。此外,一些人指出,临床医生可能依赖电子病历进行信息收集和传递,而牺牲了与患者及其他临床医生的实时沟通。鉴于许多医师诊所已经存在时间压力,电子病历和办公流程的改进有助于确保电子病历在不损害人际沟通的情况下推进医疗服务。特别是,促进采用电子病历的政策应考虑为使用电子病历的医学实习生和临床医生纳入沟通技能培训。

相似文献

1
Electronic medical records and communication with patients and other clinicians: are we talking less?电子病历以及与患者和其他临床医生的沟通:我们交流得更少了吗?
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010 Apr(131):1--4.
2
Physicians slow to e-mail routinely with patients.医生通过电子邮件定期与患者沟通的情况并不常见。
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010 Oct(134):1-5.
3
Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters.电子病历的使用与医患沟通:一项关于以色列基层医疗问诊的观察性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Apr;61(1):134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.03.004.
4
Barriers to EMR adoption in internal medicine and pediatric outpatient practices.内科和儿科门诊实践中采用电子病历的障碍。
Tenn Med. 2004 Oct;97(10):457-60.
5
Results of a survey of an online physician community regarding use of electronic medical records in office practices.一项针对在线医生社区关于电子病历在门诊实践中使用情况的调查结果。
J Med Pract Manage. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(4):254-6.
6
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
7
If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?如果电子病历如此出色,那为什么家庭医生不使用它们呢?
J Fam Pract. 2002 Jul;51(7):636-41.
8
Primary health care teams' experience of electronic medical record use after adoption.基层医疗团队采用电子病历后的使用体验。
Fam Med. 2011 Oct;43(9):638-42.
9
Electronic medical records in solo/small groups: a qualitative study of physician user types.个体/小团体诊所中的电子病历:对医生用户类型的定性研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):658-62.
10
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospects for AI clinical summarization to reduce the burden of patient chart review.人工智能临床总结减轻患者病历审查负担的前景。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Nov 7;6:1475092. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1475092. eCollection 2024.
2
Psychological, social and technical factors influencing electronic medical records systems adoption by United States physicians: a systematic model.影响美国医生采用电子病历系统的心理、社会和技术因素:一个系统模型
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 May 2;20(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00851-0.
3
An Investigation of Radiation Treatment Learning Opportunities in Relation to the Radiation Oncology Electronic Medical Record: A Single Institution Experience.
关于放射肿瘤学电子病历的放射治疗学习机会的调查:单机构经验
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Sep 29;7(1):100812. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100812. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
4
Electronic Health Records as an Educational Tool: Viewpoint.电子健康记录作为一种教育工具:观点
JMIR Med Educ. 2018 Nov 12;4(2):e10306. doi: 10.2196/10306.
5
Improving Patient-Provider Communication and Therapeutic Practice Through Better Integration of Electronic Health Records in the Exam Room: A Pilot Study.通过在诊室中更好地整合电子健康记录来改善医患沟通和治疗实践:一项试点研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Jun;46(3):484-493. doi: 10.1177/1090198118796879. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
6
Predictors of physicians' stress related to information systems: a nine-year follow-up survey study.与信息系统相关的医生压力的预测因素:一项为期九年的随访调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3094-x.
7
Secure Provider-to-Provider Communication With Electronic Health Record Messaging: An Educational Outreach Study.通过电子健康记录消息实现安全的提供者间通信:一项教育推广研究。
J Healthc Qual. 2018 Sep/Oct;40(5):283-291. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000115.
8
Finnish physicians' stress related to information systems keeps increasing: a longitudinal three-wave survey study.芬兰医生与信息系统相关的压力不断增加:一项纵向三波调查研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Oct 17;17(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0545-y.
9
Time to think about how EMRs can evolve.是时候思考电子病历如何发展了。
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Jul;61(7):593-5.
10
Work system factors influencing physicians' screen sharing behaviors in primary care encounters.影响基层医疗问诊中医师屏幕共享行为的工作系统因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):791-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 23.