Suppr超能文献

经阴道超声评估盆腔子宫内膜异位症严重程度的价值。

Value of transvaginal ultrasound in assessing severity of pelvic endometriosis.

机构信息

Early Pregnancy and Gynaecology Assessment Unit, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;36(2):241-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.7689.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the ability of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) scanning to assess the severity of pelvic endometriosis.

METHODS

Consecutive women with clinically suspected or proven pelvic endometriosis, who were booked for laparoscopy, were invited to join the study. The severity of endometriosis was assessed preoperatively using TVS and the findings were compared with the results obtained by laparoscopy using the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification.

RESULTS

In total, 201 women had preoperative TVS and laparoscopies. Of these, no endometriosis was found at laparoscopy for 62/201 (30.8%; 95% CI, 24.8-37.5), whereas 33/201 (16.4%; 95% CI, 11.9-22.2) had minimal endometriosis, 31/201 (15.4%; 95% CI, 11.1-21.1) had mild endometriosis, 27/201 (13.4%; 95% CI, 9.4-18.8) had moderate endometriosis and 48/201 (23.9%; 95% CI, 18.5-30.2) had severe endometriosis. The sensitivity and specificity of the TVS diagnosis of severe pelvic endometriosis were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.716-0.934) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.939-0.994), respectively, and the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 43.5 (95% CI, 14.1-134) and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.075-0.295), respectively. Overall, there was a good level of agreement between ultrasound and laparoscopy in identifying absent, minimal, mild, moderate and severe disease (quadratic weighted kappa = 0.786). The mean ASRM score difference between TVS and laparoscopy in assessing severity of endometriosis was -2.398 (95% CI, -4.685 to -0.1112) and the limits of agreement were -34.62 (95% CI, -38.54 to -30.709) to 29.83 (95% CI, 25.91-33.74).

CONCLUSIONS

TVS is a good test for assessing the severity of pelvic endometriosis. TVS is particularly accurate in detecting severe disease, which could facilitate more effective triaging of women for appropriate surgical care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨术前经阴道超声(TVS)扫描评估盆腔子宫内膜异位症严重程度的能力。

方法

连续纳入临床疑似或确诊为盆腔子宫内膜异位症并预约行腹腔镜检查的女性,邀请其参与本研究。术前使用 TVS 评估子宫内膜异位症的严重程度,并将结果与腹腔镜检查时采用美国生殖医学学会(ASRM)分类得出的结果进行比较。

结果

共有 201 例女性接受了术前 TVS 和腹腔镜检查。其中,62/201(30.8%;95%CI,24.8-37.5)例在腹腔镜检查中未发现子宫内膜异位症,而 33/201(16.4%;95%CI,11.9-22.2)例为轻度子宫内膜异位症,31/201(15.4%;95%CI,11.1-21.1)例为轻度子宫内膜异位症,31/201(15.4%;95%CI,11.1-21.1)例为轻度子宫内膜异位症,31/201(15.4%;95%CI,11.1-21.1)例为轻度子宫内膜异位症,31/201(15.4%;95%CI,11.1-21.1)例为轻度子宫内膜异位症,31/201(15.4%;95%CI,11.1-21.1)例为轻度子宫内膜异位症,27/201(13.4%;95%CI,9.4-18.8)例为中度子宫内膜异位症,48/201(23.9%;95%CI,18.5-30.2)例为重度子宫内膜异位症。TVS 诊断严重盆腔子宫内膜异位症的灵敏度和特异度分别为 0.85(95%CI,0.716-0.934)和 0.98(95%CI,0.939-0.994),阳性和阴性似然比分别为 43.5(95%CI,14.1-134)和 0.15(95%CI,0.075-0.295)。总体而言,超声与腹腔镜在识别无、轻度、轻度、中度和重度疾病方面具有较好的一致性(二次加权kappa=0.786)。TVS 与腹腔镜评估子宫内膜异位症严重程度的平均 ASRM 评分差异为-2.398(95%CI,-4.685 至-0.1112),一致性界限为-34.62(95%CI,-38.54 至-30.709)至 29.83(95%CI,25.91 至 33.74)。

结论

TVS 是评估盆腔子宫内膜异位症严重程度的一种良好检查方法。TVS 特别擅长检测严重疾病,这有助于更有效地对女性进行分诊,以便为其提供适当的手术治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验