Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Ann Med. 2010 Jul;42(5):371-86. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.489567.
Self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) is an increasingly common part of hypertension management. The objectives of this systematic review were to evaluate the systolic and diastolic BP reduction, and achievement of target BP, associated with self-monitoring.
MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, database of abstracts of clinical effectiveness, the health technology assessment database, the NHS economic evaluation database, and the TRIP database were searched for studies where the intervention included self-monitoring of BP and the outcome was change in office/ambulatory BP or proportion with controlled BP. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was combined with meta-regression to investigate heterogeneity in effect sizes.
A total of 25 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (27 comparisons) were identified. Office systolic BP (20 RCTs, 21 comparisons, 5,898 patients) and diastolic BP (23 RCTs, 25 comparisons, 6,038 patients) were significantly reduced in those who self-monitored compared to usual care (weighted mean difference (WMD) systolic -3.82 mmHg (95% confidence interval -5.61 to -2.03), diastolic -1.45 mmHg (-1.95 to -0.94)). Self-monitoring increased the chance of meeting office BP targets (12 RCTs, 13 comparisons, 2,260 patients, relative risk = 1.09 (1.02 to 1.16)). There was significant heterogeneity between studies for all three comparisons, which could be partially accounted for by the use of additional co-interventions.
Self-monitoring reduces blood pressure by a small but significant amount. Meta-regression could only account for part of the observed heterogeneity.
自我监测血压(BP)是高血压管理中越来越常见的一部分。本系统评价的目的是评估与自我监测相关的收缩压和舒张压降低以及目标血压达标情况。
检索 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、临床效果摘要数据库、卫生技术评估数据库、英国国家卫生服务经济评估数据库和 TRIP 数据库,纳入包含自我监测 BP 作为干预措施且以诊室/动态血压变化或血压控制比例作为结局的研究。两名评价者独立提取数据。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并结合荟萃回归分析来调查效应量的异质性。
共纳入 25 项符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)(27 项比较)。与常规护理相比,自我监测者的诊室收缩压(20 项 RCT,21 项比较,5898 例患者)和舒张压(23 项 RCT,25 项比较,6038 例患者)显著降低(加权均数差值(WMD)收缩压-3.82mmHg(95%置信区间-5.61 至-2.03),舒张压-1.45mmHg(-1.95 至-0.94))。自我监测增加了达到诊室血压目标的机会(12 项 RCT,13 项比较,2260 例患者,相对风险=1.09(1.02 至 1.16))。所有三项比较均存在显著的研究间异质性,这部分可归因于额外联合干预的使用。
自我监测可显著降低血压,但降低幅度较小。荟萃回归只能解释部分观察到的异质性。