Laboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, European University Miguel de Cervantes, Valladolid, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jun;24(6):1609-15. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181dc427e.
The purpose of this study was to compare strength training with and without superimposed electromyostimulation (EMS) on muscle strength and anaerobic power. Twenty-eight subjects were assigned to: weight+EMS (ES), weight (VOL), or control group (CG). ES and VOL performed 4 training sessions per week during 4 weeks on a knee extension machine (8 sets; 8 repetitions; 1-second concentric phase from 90 degrees to 0 degrees, 1-second eccentric phase from 0 degrees to 90 degrees , 1-second rest at 90 degrees; 3-minute rest between sets; 70% maximal voluntary contraction). Group ES received EMS in the concentric phase of each action (120 Hz, 400 microseconds). Before training, after training, and 2 weeks after the end of the training (detraining), maximal voluntary contraction, squat jump, countermovement jump (CMJ), countermovement jump with free arms (CMJA), and 20-m sprint time were analyzed. After the training period, ES and VOL increased their muscle strength (40.2% and 31.4%, respectively, p<0.001). After the detraining period, this gain remained above baseline values for ES and VOL (49.1% and 24.5%, respectively, p<0.001). Changes in muscle strength between baseline and detraining were higher in ES than in VOL (p<0.01). Anaerobic performance was not affected by training in any group, but percentage change between baseline and after training suggests that the CMJ and CMJA with free arms performance were impaired in ES with respect to VOL and CG. Superimposed EMS onto voluntary contractions increases strength more than voluntary training alone; nevertheless, a detraining period should be respected to observe this delayed adaptation. To improve anaerobic power with superimposed EMS, a complementary and specific work such as plyometrics should be carried out.
本研究旨在比较有和无附加肌电刺激(EMS)的力量训练对肌肉力量和无氧功率的影响。28 名受试者被分配到:重量+EMS(ES)、重量(VOL)或对照组(CG)。ES 和 VOL 在 4 周内每周进行 4 次训练,在膝关节伸展机上进行(8 组;8 次重复;1 秒向心阶段从 90 度到 0 度,1 秒离心阶段从 0 度到 90 度,1 秒在 90 度休息;组间休息 3 分钟;最大自主收缩的 70%)。ES 组在每个动作的向心阶段接受 EMS(120 Hz,400 微秒)。在训练前、训练后和训练结束后 2 周(脱训),分析了最大自主收缩、深蹲跳、反向跳(CMJ)、反向跳加自由手臂(CMJA)和 20 米冲刺时间。在训练期间,ES 和 VOL 增加了他们的肌肉力量(分别为 40.2%和 31.4%,p<0.001)。在脱训期间,ES 和 VOL 的肌肉力量仍然高于基线值(分别为 49.1%和 24.5%,p<0.001)。与 VOL 和 CG 相比,ES 组在基线和脱训期间的肌肉力量变化更高(p<0.01)。在任何组中,训练都没有影响无氧表现,但与基线相比的百分比变化表明,与 VOL 和 CG 相比,ES 的 CMJ 和 CMJA 与自由手臂的表现受损。与单纯的自愿训练相比,将 EMS 叠加到自愿收缩上可以增加力量;然而,应该尊重脱训期以观察这种延迟适应。为了通过叠加 EMS 提高无氧能力,应该进行补充和特定的工作,如增强式训练。