Shiikawa A, Koyanagi H, Endo M, Yagi Y, Nakano H, Hayashi K, Yamazaki K, Akimoto T
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo.
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991 Mar;39(3):294-300.
Five patients (pts) with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias (idiopathic VF; 2 pts, Torsade de pointest; 1 pt, VT/VF after valve replacement; 2 pts) underwent surgical treatment of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD). Implantation of an AICD was indicated for patients who survived circulatory arrest due to documented VT and/or VF. The patient should be medically refractory or medical treatment precluded by hemodynamic instability; other surgical treatment should not be possible. We selected myocardial electrode for sensing and small and large patch electrodes for defibrillating. VF/VT was induced 1 to 6 times for the measurement of defibrillation threshold (DFT). In all of our pts, the AICD appropriately discharged at postoperative EPS. In three of pts, the AICD discharged within the postoperative hospital phase, in two because of sinus tachycardia during treadmill test and restored sinus rhythm after non-sustained VT. As for complications, in one pt. with severe LV dysfunction, incessant form of VT/VF occurred after DFT testing and LV assist circulation and IABP were needed. In two pts, inappropriate discharge and in two, pericarditis were recognized postoperatively. It was considered that this system was effective for the treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias but strict indication was necessary because of unsolved problems.
五名患有危及生命的室性快速心律失常的患者(特发性室颤;2例,尖端扭转型室速;1例,瓣膜置换术后室速/室颤;2例)接受了植入式自动心脏除颤器(AICD)的手术治疗。对于因记录到的室速和/或室颤而经历循环骤停后存活的患者,建议植入AICD。患者应药物治疗无效或因血流动力学不稳定而无法进行药物治疗;不应有其他手术治疗方法。我们选择心肌电极进行感知,选择小和大的片状电极进行除颤。为测量除颤阈值(DFT),诱发室颤/室速1至6次。在我们所有的患者中,AICD在术后电生理检查时均能适当放电。在三名患者中,AICD在术后住院期间放电,两名患者是因为在跑步机测试期间出现窦性心动过速,在非持续性室速后恢复窦性心律。至于并发症,一名严重左心室功能不全的患者在DFT测试后出现持续性室速/室颤形式,需要左心室辅助循环和主动脉内球囊反搏。两名患者术后出现不适当放电,两名患者术后出现心包炎。认为该系统对治疗危及生命的室性快速心律失常有效,但由于存在未解决的问题,需要严格掌握适应症。