• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性抑郁症治疗方法的差异效果:潜在增长模型再分析。

Differential effects of treatments for chronic depression: a latent growth model reanalysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):409-19. doi: 10.1037/a0019267.

DOI:10.1037/a0019267
PMID:20515216
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Psychotherapy-pharmacotherapy combinations are frequently recommended for the treatment of chronic depressive disorders. Our aim in this novel reanalysis of archival data was to identify patient subgroups on the basis of symptom trajectories and examine the clinical significance of the resultant classification on basis of differential treatment effects to psychotherapy (cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy), pharmacotherapy (nefazodone), and their combination.

METHOD

We selected data for 504 patients diagnosed with chronic depression from archival data of a clinical trial (N = 681) and analyzed treatment courses (as assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) using growth mixture models, a contemporary exploratory analysis technique.

RESULTS

Three patient subgroups were identified from the typical patterns of change of depression severity during 12-week acute-phase treatment. Within these patient subgroups, differential treatment effects were evident: combination treatment clearly outperformed the 2 monotherapies in the largest patient subgroup, characterized by moderate depression severity, but not in the remaining 2 subgroups, characterized by low and severe depression at baseline. Patient characteristics prior to initiation of treatment enabled allocation of 61% of patients to these subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Research on patient subgroups with different change patterns may support classifications of patients that indicate which treatment is most effective for which type of patient.

摘要

目的

心理治疗与药物治疗的联合应用常被推荐用于慢性抑郁障碍的治疗。本研究旨在通过对档案数据的重新分析,基于症状轨迹识别患者亚组,并根据不同治疗效果(认知行为分析系统心理疗法、奈法唑酮)和联合治疗的差异来检验这种分类方法的临床意义。

方法

我们从一项临床试验的档案数据中选择了 504 名被诊断为慢性抑郁症的患者的数据(N=681),并使用增长混合模型(一种现代的探索性分析技术)对治疗过程(通过汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表评估)进行分析。

结果

从 12 周急性治疗期间抑郁严重程度的典型变化模式中,我们确定了三个患者亚组。在这些患者亚组中,治疗效果存在差异:在以中度抑郁为特征的最大患者亚组中,联合治疗明显优于两种单药治疗,但在其余两个以基线时轻度和重度抑郁为特征的亚组中则不然。治疗开始前的患者特征使 61%的患者能够被分配到这些亚组中。

结论

对具有不同变化模式的患者亚组进行研究,可能有助于对患者进行分类,以确定哪种治疗对哪种类型的患者最有效。

相似文献

1
Differential effects of treatments for chronic depression: a latent growth model reanalysis.慢性抑郁症治疗方法的差异效果:潜在增长模型再分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):409-19. doi: 10.1037/a0019267.
2
Patterns of early change and their relationship to outcome and follow-up among patients with major depressive disorders.重度抑郁症患者的早期变化模式及其与结局和随访的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Nov;118(1-3):60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.019. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
3
Acute and maintenance treatment of chronic depression.慢性抑郁症的急性和维持治疗。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62 Suppl 6:10-6.
4
Dropouts versus completers among chronically depressed outpatients.慢性抑郁症门诊患者中的退出者与完成治疗者
J Affect Disord. 2007 Jan;97(1-3):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.06.017. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
5
Therapeutic reactance as a predictor of outcome in the treatment of chronic depression.治疗阻抗作为慢性抑郁症治疗结果的预测指标。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Dec;71(6):1025-35. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.6.1025.
6
Cognitive therapy versus fluoxetine in the treatment of dysthymic disorder.认知疗法与氟西汀治疗恶劣心境障碍的比较
Depression. 1996;4(1):34-41. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7162(1996)4:1<34::AID-DEPR4>3.0.CO;2-F.
7
Severity and duration of depression, not personality factors, predict short term outcome in the treatment of major depression.抑郁症的严重程度和持续时间而非人格因素可预测重度抑郁症治疗的短期结果。
J Affect Disord. 2007 Dec;104(1-3):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
8
Catch 22: a case of mutually denied chronic depression.第二十二条军规:一例相互否认的慢性抑郁症病例。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):238-46. doi: 10.3109/10673229.2010.496628.
9
Combination treatment for acute depression is superior only when psychotherapy is added to medication.急性抑郁症的联合治疗仅在药物治疗基础上加用心理治疗时才更具优势。
Psychother Psychosom. 2007;76(5):289-97. doi: 10.1159/000104705.
10
Select comorbid personality disorders and the treatment of chronic depression with nefazodone, targeted psychotherapy, or their combination.选择共病的人格障碍以及使用奈法唑酮、针对性心理治疗或两者联合治疗慢性抑郁症。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Oct;117(3):174-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.010. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Trajectory Modeling and Response Prediction in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression.抑郁症经颅磁刺激中的轨迹建模与反应预测
Pers Med Psychiatry. 2024 Nov-Dec;47-48. doi: 10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100135. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
Trajectory Modeling and Response Prediction in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression.经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症的轨迹建模与反应预测
medRxiv. 2024 May 31:2024.05.30.24308258. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.30.24308258.
3
Neural Activation Acupuncture in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.
重度抑郁症患者的神经激活针刺疗法:一项功能近红外光谱研究
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 12;12:669533. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.669533. eCollection 2021.
4
Impact of Baseline Characteristics on the Effectiveness of Disorder-Specific Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and Supportive Psychotherapy in Outpatient Treatment for Persistent Depressive Disorder.基线特征对针对持续性抑郁症门诊治疗的特定障碍认知行为分析心理治疗系统(CBASP)和支持性心理治疗效果的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 21;11:607300. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.607300. eCollection 2020.
5
Distinct trajectories of response to prefrontal tDCS in major depression: results from a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.前额叶经颅直流电刺激治疗重性抑郁的反应轨迹存在差异:一项 3 臂随机对照试验的结果。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Mar;46(4):774-782. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00935-x. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
6
Trajectories of depression symptom change during and following treatment in adolescents with unipolar major depression.青少年单相重性抑郁障碍患者治疗期间和治疗后的抑郁症状变化轨迹。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 May;61(5):565-574. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13145. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
7
Response rate profiles for major depressive disorder: Characterizing early response and longitudinal nonresponse.重度抑郁症的应答率特征:早期应答和纵向无应答的描述。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Oct;35(10):992-1000. doi: 10.1002/da.22832. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
8
Construction of longitudinal prediction targets using semisupervised learning.利用半监督学习构建纵向预测目标。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2674-2693. doi: 10.1177/0962280216684163. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
9
Targeted use of growth mixture modeling: a learning perspective.生长混合模型的靶向应用:一种学习视角。
Stat Med. 2017 Feb 20;36(4):671-686. doi: 10.1002/sim.7152. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
10
Predicting Response Trajectories during Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Panic Disorder: No Association with the BDNF Gene or Childhood Maltreatment.预测惊恐障碍认知行为疗法中的反应轨迹:与脑源性神经营养因子基因或童年期虐待无关。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 29;11(6):e0158224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158224. eCollection 2016.