• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用 2%洗必泰凝胶、蜂胶、桑椹汁、2%聚维酮碘和氢氧化钙对牙本质小管进行消毒。

Dentinal tubule disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine gel, propolis, morinda citrifolia juice, 2% povidone iodine, and calcium hydroxide.

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College, Porur, Chennai, India.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2010 May;43(5):419-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01696.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01696.x
PMID:20518935
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gel, propolis, Morinda citrifolia juice (MCJ), 2% povidone Iodine (POV-I), and calcium hydroxide on Enterococcus faecalis-infected root canal dentine at two different depths (200 microm and 400 microm) and three time intervals (day 1, 3 & 5).

METHODOLOGY

One hundred and eighty extracted human teeth were infected for 21 days with E. faecalis. Samples were divided into six groups. Group I (Saline) (Negative control), Group II (Propolis), Group III (MCJ), Group IV (2% Povidone Iodine), Group V (2% Chlorhexidine Gel), Group VI (Calcium hydroxide). At the end of 1, 3, and 5 days, the remaining vital bacterial population was assessed. Dentine shavings were collected at two depths (200 microm and 400 microm), and total numbers of colony forming units were determined. The values were analysed statistically with one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey multiple comparison test. The paired t-test was used to check for differences in growth at different time intervals within groups and for differences at the two depths (P < 0.01)

RESULTS

The number of colony-forming units was statistically significant in all groups compared to the control group (Saline). Group V (chlorhexidine gluconate) (100%) produced better antimicrobial efficacy followed by 2% POV-I (87%), propolis (71%), MCJ (69%), and calcium hydroxide (55%). There was no significant difference between propolis and MCJ and no significant difference between data at 200 microm and 400 microm.

CONCLUSION

Propolis and MCJ were effective against E. faecalis in dentine of extracted teeth.

摘要

目的

研究 2%洗必泰凝胶、蜂胶、桑椹果汁(MCJ)、2%聚维酮碘(POV-I)和氢氧化钙对 200μm 和 400μm 两个不同深度及 1、3、5 天三个时间间隔的粪肠球菌感染根管牙本质的抗菌活性。

方法

将 180 颗人离体牙用粪肠球菌感染 21 天。样本分为六组。第 I 组(生理盐水)(阴性对照)、第 II 组(蜂胶)、第 III 组(MCJ)、第 IV 组(2%聚维酮碘)、第 V 组(2%洗必泰凝胶)、第 VI 组(氢氧化钙)。在第 1、3、5 天结束时,评估剩余的活菌数。收集 200μm 和 400μm 两个深度的牙本质屑,测定总菌落形成单位数。用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 多重比较检验对数值进行统计学分析。用配对 t 检验检查组内不同时间间隔的生长差异以及两组深度的差异(P<0.01)。

结果

与对照组(生理盐水)相比,所有组的菌落形成单位数均有统计学意义。第 V 组(葡萄糖酸氯己定)(100%)的抗菌效果最好,其次是 2% POV-I(87%)、蜂胶(71%)、MCJ(69%)和氢氧化钙(55%)。蜂胶和 MCJ 之间差异无统计学意义,200μm 和 400μm 之间数据差异无统计学意义。

结论

蜂胶和 MCJ 对离体牙牙本质中的粪肠球菌有效。

相似文献

1
Dentinal tubule disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine gel, propolis, morinda citrifolia juice, 2% povidone iodine, and calcium hydroxide.用 2%洗必泰凝胶、蜂胶、桑椹汁、2%聚维酮碘和氢氧化钙对牙本质小管进行消毒。
Int Endod J. 2010 May;43(5):419-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01696.x.
2
Antimicrobial effects of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine, and propolis on Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans.氢氧化钙、氯己定和蜂胶对粪肠球菌和白色念珠菌的抗菌作用。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2014 Aug;5(3):194-200. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12041. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
3
Effectiveness of propolis and calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal medicament against Enterococcus faecalis: a laboratory study.蜂胶与氢氧化钙作为抗粪肠球菌短期根管内药物的有效性:一项实验室研究。
Aust Endod J. 2009 Aug;35(2):52-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2008.00125.x.
4
Recovery of Enterococcus faecalis after single- or multiple-visit root canal treatments carried out in infected teeth ex vivo.在体外对感染牙齿进行单次或多次根管治疗后粪肠球菌的恢复情况。
Int Endod J. 2005 Oct;38(10):697-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00992.x.
5
In vitro assessment of the effectiveness of chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide paste with chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans.洗必泰凝胶和含洗必泰的氢氧化钙糊剂对粪肠球菌和白色念珠菌有效性的体外评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Aug;102(2):e27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.02.022. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
6
Antimicrobial effects of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis.氢氧化钙和洗必泰对粪肠球菌的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.013. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
7
Efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation with natural irrigants (Morinda citrifolia juice, Aloe Vera and Propolis) in comparison with 1% sodium hypochlorite for removal of E. faecalis biofilm: an in vitro study.天然冲洗剂(巴戟天果汁、芦荟和蜂胶)被动超声冲洗与1%次氯酸钠去除粪肠球菌生物膜效果的比较:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):35-41. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114938.
8
Antibacterial activity of Propolis versus conventional endodontic disinfectants against Enterococcus faecalis in infected dentinal tubules.蜂胶对感染牙本质小管内粪肠球菌的抗菌活性与常规根管消毒药物的比较。
J Endod. 2011 Mar;37(3):376-81. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.024. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
9
Comparative evaluation of propolis and triantibiotic mixture as an intracanal medicament against Enterococcus faecalis.蜂胶与三联抗生素混合物对粪肠球菌的根管内药物疗效比较评价。
J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1287-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.028. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
10
Disinfection of dentinal tubules with 2% chlorhexidine, 2% metronidazole, bioactive glass when compared with calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicaments.与氢氧化钙作为根管内药物相比,2%洗必泰、2%甲硝唑、生物活性玻璃对牙本质小管的消毒作用。
J Endod. 2007 Dec;33(12):1473-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.08.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Radicular Defense: The Impact of Cross-Linking Agents on Antibiofilm Activity and Collagen Integrity With Bioceramic Sealers.增强神经根防御:交联剂对生物陶瓷封闭剂抗生物膜活性和胶原蛋白完整性的影响
Cureus. 2025 Aug 11;17(8):e89815. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89815. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
The Clinical Effectiveness of Propolis on the Endodontic Treatment of Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials and Updates.蜂胶在恒牙牙髓治疗中的临床疗效:随机临床试验的系统评价及更新
Cureus. 2025 Jan 14;17(1):e77430. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77430. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy of , Triphala, and Extracts as Root Canal Irrigants in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
三果木、没药与提取物作为乳磨牙根管冲洗剂的抗菌效果比较:一项随机临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 May;17(5):511-517. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2725.
4
Endodontic Applications of Propolis in Primary and Permanent Teeth: A Scoping Review of Clinical Studies.蜂胶在乳牙和恒牙牙髓病学中的应用:临床研究的范围综述。
Eur Endod J. 2024 Aug 22;9(3):167-79. doi: 10.14744/eej.2024.65487.
5
Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chemical and Phytomedicinal Agents When Used As Intracanal Irrigants: An In Vitro Study.化学药剂与植物药作为根管冲洗剂时抗菌效果的比较评价:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2023 Nov 13;15(11):e48754. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48754. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of different combinations of calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis.不同浓度氢氧化钙组合抗粪肠球菌效果的比较评价。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 11;23(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03552-4.
7
Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Novel Automated Irrigation Device As Compared to Conventional Needle Irrigation Against Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Study.一种新型自动冲洗装置与传统针头冲洗针对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果比较:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2023 Sep 14;15(9):e45200. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45200. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
The Interaction of Two Widely Used Endodontic Irrigants, Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite, and Its Impact on the Disinfection Protocol during Root Canal Treatment.两种广泛使用的根管冲洗剂——氯己定和次氯酸钠的相互作用及其对根管治疗消毒方案的影响。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;12(3):589. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030589.
9
Quantitative Assessment of Dentinal Tubule Disinfection in Absence of Biofilm on Root Canal Walls: An Study.根管壁无生物膜时牙本质小管消毒的定量评估:一项研究
Iran Endod J. 2020 Summer;15(3):155-165. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i3.27453.
10
Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and 810 nm Diode Laser in the Disinfection of Root Canals Contaminated With Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Study.洗必泰和810纳米二极管激光对粪肠球菌污染根管消毒抗菌效果的比较评价:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2022 Aug 30;14(8):e28596. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28596. eCollection 2022 Aug.