Bridges Thomas M, LeBois Evan P, Hopkins Corey R, Wood Michael R, Jones Carrie K, Conn P Jeffrey, Lindsley Craig W
Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Drug News Perspect. 2010 May;23(4):229-40. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2010.23.4.1416977.
The cholinergic hypothesis of schizophrenia emerged over 50 years ago based on clinical observations with both anticholinergics and pan-muscarinic agonists. Not until the 1990s did the cholinergic hypothesis of schizophrenia receive renewed enthusiasm based on clinical data with xanomeline, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M(1)/M(4)-preferring orthosteric agonist. In a clinical trial with Alzheimer's patients, xanomeline not only improved cognitive performance, but also reduced psychotic behaviors. This encouraging data spurred a second clinical trial in schizophrenic patients, wherein xanomeline significantly improved the positive, negative and cognitive symptom clusters. However, the question remained: Was the antipsychotic efficacy due to activation of M(1), M(4) or both M(1)/M(4)? Classical orthosteric ligands lacked the muscarinic receptor subtype selectivity required to address this key question. More recently, functional assays have allowed for the discovery of ligands that bind at allosteric sites, binding sites distinct from the orthosteric (acetylcholine) site, which are structurally less conserved and thereby afford high levels of receptor subtype selectivity. Recently, allosteric ligands, with unprecedented selectivity for either M(1) or M(4), have been discovered and have demonstrated comparable efficacy to xanomeline in preclinical antipsychotic and cognition models. These data suggest that selective allosteric activation of either M(1) or M(4) has antipsychotic potential through distinct, yet complimentary mechanisms.
精神分裂症的胆碱能假说在50多年前基于使用抗胆碱能药物和泛毒蕈碱激动剂的临床观察而出现。直到20世纪90年代,基于使用毒蕈碱乙酰胆碱受体M(1)/M(4)偏好的正构激动剂占诺美林的临床数据,精神分裂症的胆碱能假说才重新受到关注。在一项针对阿尔茨海默病患者的临床试验中,占诺美林不仅改善了认知表现,还减少了精神症状。这些令人鼓舞的数据促使针对精神分裂症患者开展了第二项临床试验,其中占诺美林显著改善了阳性、阴性和认知症状群。然而,问题依然存在:抗精神病疗效是由于M(1)、M(4)的激活还是M(1)/M(4)两者的激活?经典的正构配体缺乏解决这个关键问题所需的毒蕈碱受体亚型选择性。最近,功能测定法使得能够发现结合变构位点的配体,变构位点不同于正构(乙酰胆碱)位点,其结构保守性较低,从而具有高水平的受体亚型选择性。最近,已经发现了对M(1)或M(4)具有前所未有的选择性的变构配体,并且在临床前抗精神病和认知模型中已证明其疗效与占诺美林相当。这些数据表明,选择性变构激活M(1)或M(4)通过不同但互补的机制具有抗精神病潜力。