Suppr超能文献

水基泡沫与惰性气体大规模紧急疏散方法的比较。

Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.

作者信息

Alphin R L, Rankin M K, Johnson K J, Benson E R

机构信息

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Avian Bioscience Center, University of Delaware, 107 C. C. Allen Biotechnology Laboratory, Newark, DE 19716-2150, USA.

出版信息

Avian Dis. 2010 Mar;54(1 Suppl):757-62. doi: 10.1637/8764-033109-Reg.1.

Abstract

Current control strategies for avian influenza (AI) and other highly contagious poultry diseases include surveillance, quarantine, depopulation, disposal, and decontamination. Selection of the best method of emergency mass depopulation involves maximizing human health and safety while minimizing disease spread and animal welfare concerns. Proper selection must ensure that the method is compatible with the species, age, housing type, and disposal options. No one single method is appropriate for all situations. Gassing is one of the accepted methods for euthanatizing poultry. Whole-house, partial-house, or containerized gassing procedures are currently used. The use of water-based foam was developed for emergency mass depopulation and was conditionally approved by the United States Department of Agriculture in 2006. Research has been done comparing these different methods; parameters such as time to brain death, consistency of time to brain death, and pretreatment and posttreatment corticosterone stress levels were considered. In Europe, the use of foam with carbon dioxide is preferred over conventional water-based foam. A recent experiment comparing CO2 gas, foam with CO2 gas, and foam without CO2 gas depopulation methods was conducted with the use of electroencephalometry results. Foam was as consistent as CO2 gassing and more consistent than argon-CO2 gassing. There were no statistically significant differences between foam methods.

摘要

当前针对禽流感(AI)及其他高传染性家禽疾病的防控策略包括监测、检疫、扑杀、处置和消毒。选择最佳的紧急大规模扑杀方法时,要在最大限度保障人类健康和安全的同时,尽量减少疾病传播和动物福利方面的问题。正确的选择必须确保该方法适用于家禽的品种、年龄、饲养类型及处置方式。没有一种方法适用于所有情况。毒气法是公认的家禽安乐死方法之一。目前采用整舍、部分鸡舍或集装箱式毒气处理程序。水基泡沫法是为紧急大规模扑杀而研发的,并于2006年获得美国农业部有条件批准。已开展研究对这些不同方法进行比较;考虑了诸如脑死亡时间、脑死亡时间的一致性以及处理前后皮质酮应激水平等参数。在欧洲,含二氧化碳的泡沫法比传统的水基泡沫法更受青睐。最近利用脑电图测量结果进行了一项实验,比较了二氧化碳气体法、含二氧化碳气体的泡沫法和不含二氧化碳气体的泡沫法等扑杀方法。泡沫法与二氧化碳毒气法效果相当,且比氩气 - 二氧化碳毒气法更稳定。不同泡沫法之间在统计学上无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验