Suppr超能文献

基于泡沫的地面饲养肉用型家禽养殖场大规模紧急疏散

Foam-based mass emergency depopulation of floor-reared meat-type poultry operations.

作者信息

Benson E, Malone G W, Alphin R L, Dawson M D, Pope C R, Van Wicklen G L

机构信息

Department of Bioresources Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2007 Feb;86(2):219-24. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.2.219.

Abstract

Current control strategies for avian influenza and other highly contagious poultry diseases often include quarantine, depopulation, and disposal of infected birds. For biosecurity reasons, on-farm depopulation and disposal methods are preferred. The options for mass depopulation are limited, as reported by the "2000 Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia." Current depopulation techniques may have excessive labor requirements, are not appropriate for all house types, and may not be suitable for large-scale emergency implementation. A procedure has been developed that uses foam to rapidly form a blanket over the birds. The procedure requires relatively few people, can be performed in a variety of house types, and is compatible with in-house composting. Results from 2 experiments using foam for depopulation are presented in this paper. These studies have shown that foams are comparable to the CO(2) polyethylene tent procedure in time to death in small groups and that the foam is faster as group size increases. Adding CO(2) to the foam does not enhance its efficacy. Based on corticosterone levels, the study also showed that the foams are no more stressful than the CO(2) depopulation method. Necropsy and histological examination of birds indicated that blood was present to some degree in the trachea, syrinx, and bronchial tree in broilers subjected to foam with CO(2), foam without CO(2), and CO(2) polyethylene tent methods of depopulation. Foam caused a rapid onset of airway occlusion. In both foam- and CO(2)-euthanized broilers, lesions are consistent with anoxia or hypoxia. This suggests that foam acts by physically induced hypoxia, whereas CO(2) causes chemically induced hypoxia.

摘要

当前针对禽流感和其他高传染性家禽疾病的防控策略通常包括隔离、扑杀以及处理感染禽类。出于生物安全考虑,农场内的扑杀和处理方法更为可取。正如《美国兽医协会安乐死专家组2000年报告》所指出的,大规模扑杀的选择有限。当前的扑杀技术可能劳动力需求过高,不适用于所有禽舍类型,且可能不适合大规模紧急实施。现已开发出一种程序,利用泡沫迅速在禽类上方形成覆盖层。该程序所需人员相对较少,可在多种禽舍类型中实施,并且与场内堆肥兼容。本文展示了两项使用泡沫进行扑杀的实验结果。这些研究表明,在小群体中,泡沫在致死亡时间方面与二氧化碳聚乙烯帐篷法相当,且随着群体规模增大,泡沫致死亡速度更快。向泡沫中添加二氧化碳并不会提高其效果。基于皮质酮水平,该研究还表明,泡沫造成的压力并不比二氧化碳扑杀法更大。对禽类进行尸检和组织学检查发现,采用含二氧化碳泡沫、不含二氧化碳泡沫以及二氧化碳聚乙烯帐篷扑杀法处理的肉鸡,其气管、鸣管和支气管树中均有一定程度的血液存在。泡沫导致气道迅速堵塞。在经泡沫和二氧化碳安乐死的肉鸡中,病变均与缺氧或低氧相符。这表明泡沫通过物理诱导缺氧起作用,而二氧化碳则导致化学诱导缺氧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验