• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用水基中膨胀泡沫作为一种淘汰仔猪的方法所收集的脑电图数据描述。

Description of electroencephalographic data gathered using water-based medium-expansion foam as a depopulation method for nursery pigs.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA.

Pediatric Neurology Department, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 7;12(1):16798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21353-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-21353-7
PMID:36207428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9546833/
Abstract

The United States' swine industry is under constant threat of foreign animal diseases, which may emerge without warning due to the globalized transportation networks moving people, animals, and products. Therefore, having disease control and elimination protocols in place prior to pathogen introduction is paramount for business continuity and economic recovery. During extraordinary circumstances, it may become necessary to depopulate large populations of animals, including swine, as a disease containment measure. Currently approved depopulation methods for swine present significant logistical challenges when scaled to large populations or performed in field conditions. In the United States, water-based foam is currently approved for poultry depopulation, and recent field studies demonstrate water-based foam is an effective depopulation alternative for swine. While effective, the speed at which water-based foam induces loss of consciousness prior to death, a major welfare consideration, has not been adequately investigated. In this study, 12 nursery pigs were terminated using water-based medium-expansion foam to quantify the time to induce loss of consciousness and ultimately brain death. Each pig was implanted with subdermal electrodes to capture electroencephalographic data, placed in a body sling, and suspended in a plastic bulk container that was subsequently filled with water-based foam. Electroencephalographic data was recorded for 15 min, during which the pigs remained immersed in the water-based foam. Conservatively, average (± SD) time to unconsciousness and brain death was 1 min, 53 s ± 36 s and 3 min, 3 s ± 56 s, respectively. The relatively rapid loss of consciousness compared to other methods limits the amount of distress and is overall a positive finding for the welfare of the pigs that might be depopulated with water-based foam. The findings of this study add additional evidence supporting the use of water-based medium-expansion foam for an emergency depopulation of swine.

摘要

美国的养猪业一直受到外来动物疾病的威胁,这些疾病可能会因全球化的交通网络而在没有预警的情况下出现,这些网络将人和动物以及产品进行了转移。因此,在病原体传入之前制定疾病控制和消除方案对于业务连续性和经济复苏至关重要。在特殊情况下,可能需要对包括猪在内的大量动物进行扑杀,作为疾病控制措施。目前,经批准用于猪的扑杀方法在大规模应用或在野外条件下实施时存在重大的后勤挑战。在美国,水基泡沫目前被批准用于家禽扑杀,最近的实地研究表明,水基泡沫是一种有效的猪扑杀替代方法。虽然有效,但水基泡沫在诱导失去意识之前使动物死亡的速度,这是一个主要的福利考虑因素,尚未得到充分研究。在这项研究中,使用水基中膨胀泡沫扑杀 12 头保育猪,以确定诱导失去意识并最终导致脑死亡所需的时间。每头猪都被植入皮下电极以捕获脑电图数据,放置在身体吊索中,并悬挂在一个塑料散装容器中,然后将水基泡沫填充到该容器中。脑电图数据记录了 15 分钟,在此期间,猪一直浸泡在水基泡沫中。保守估计,无意识和脑死亡的平均(±标准差)时间分别为 1 分 53 秒±36 秒和 3 分 3 秒±56 秒。与其他方法相比,水基泡沫相对较快地导致动物失去意识,这限制了动物的痛苦程度,总体上是水基泡沫扑杀猪的福利的一个积极发现。这项研究的结果为水基中膨胀泡沫在紧急扑杀猪群方面的应用提供了额外的证据支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e37d/9546833/fe4d65763781/41598_2022_21353_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e37d/9546833/375f11807d86/41598_2022_21353_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e37d/9546833/fe4d65763781/41598_2022_21353_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e37d/9546833/375f11807d86/41598_2022_21353_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e37d/9546833/fe4d65763781/41598_2022_21353_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Description of electroencephalographic data gathered using water-based medium-expansion foam as a depopulation method for nursery pigs.使用水基中膨胀泡沫作为一种淘汰仔猪的方法所收集的脑电图数据描述。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 7;12(1):16798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21353-7.
2
Reliability of water-based medium-expansion foam as a depopulation method for nursery pigs and cull sows.水基中膨胀泡沫作为一种淘汰保育猪和淘汰母猪的方法的可靠性。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Sep;69(5):e2719-e2730. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14622. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Refinement of water-based foam depopulation procedures for finisher pigs during field conditions: Welfare implications and logistical aspects.在现场条件下对育肥猪进行基于水的泡沫淘汰程序的精细化:福利影响和物流方面。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Aug;217:105974. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105974. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
4
Evaluation of a Water-Based Medium-Expansion Foam Depopulation Method in Suckling and Finisher Pigs.哺乳期和育肥期仔猪水基中膨胀泡沫猪群减少方法的评估
Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 16;12(8):1041. doi: 10.3390/ani12081041.
5
Perceptions of swine industry stakeholders on the use of water-based foam, high-expansion nitrogen foam, and carbon dioxide gas as methods of swine depopulation.养猪业利益相关者对水基泡沫、高膨胀氮气泡沫和二氧化碳气体在猪群淘汰方法中的应用的看法。
Prev Vet Med. 2024 Dec;233:106356. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106356. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
6
Comparison of Gaseous and Water-Based Medium-Expansion Foam Depopulation Methods in Cull Sows.母猪淘汰中气态和水基中膨胀泡沫灭群方法的比较
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 7;11(11):3179. doi: 10.3390/ani11113179.
7
Swine industry stakeholders' perception on the use of water-based foam as an emergency mass depopulation method.养猪业利益相关者对用水基泡沫作为紧急大规模扑杀方法的看法。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):e0290400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290400. eCollection 2023.
8
Water-based medium-expansion foam depopulation of adult cattle.成年牛的水基中等膨胀泡沫灭虫法
Transl Anim Sci. 2023 Jun 28;7(1):txad065. doi: 10.1093/tas/txad065. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
Comparison of water-based foam and carbon dioxide gas emergency depopulation methods of turkeys.水基泡沫和二氧化碳气体紧急扑杀火鸡方法的比较。
Poult Sci. 2013 Dec;92(12):3144-8. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03341.
10
Physiological and behavioral responses of poultry exposed to gas-filled high expansion foam.禽类暴露于充满气体的高膨胀泡沫中的生理和行为反应。
Poult Sci. 2013 May;92(5):1145-54. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02587.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of commercially available class A water-based foam concentrates for swine depopulation.用于猪群扑杀的市售 A 类水成膜泡沫灭火剂的评估
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0328073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328073. eCollection 2025.
2
Medium-expansion water-based foam depopulation of sheep and goats.中倍数水基泡沫对绵羊和山羊的驱散
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10881-7.
3
Technical note: Construction of a CO supply system for depopulation of pigs in a container.技术说明:用于在容器中对猪进行种群扑杀的一氧化碳供应系统的构建

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a Water-Based Medium-Expansion Foam Depopulation Method in Suckling and Finisher Pigs.哺乳期和育肥期仔猪水基中膨胀泡沫猪群减少方法的评估
Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 16;12(8):1041. doi: 10.3390/ani12081041.
2
Comparison of Gaseous and Water-Based Medium-Expansion Foam Depopulation Methods in Cull Sows.母猪淘汰中气态和水基中膨胀泡沫灭群方法的比较
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 7;11(11):3179. doi: 10.3390/ani11113179.
3
A case study of ventilation shutdown with the addition of high temperature and humidity for depopulation of pigs.
Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Mar 11;9:txaf034. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf034. eCollection 2025.
4
Assessment of three large-scale depopulation methods for swine.三种大规模猪群扑杀方法的评估。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0320217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320217. eCollection 2025.
5
The use of high expansion foam for stunning and killing pigs and poultry.使用高膨胀泡沫使猪和家禽昏迷及致死。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 12;22(7):e8855. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8855. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Water-based medium-expansion foam depopulation of adult cattle.成年牛的水基中等膨胀泡沫灭虫法
Transl Anim Sci. 2023 Jun 28;7(1):txad065. doi: 10.1093/tas/txad065. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
The Rise of Heatstroke as a Method of Depopulating Pigs and Poultry: Implications for the US Veterinary Profession.中暑作为一种减少猪和家禽数量的方法的兴起:对美国兽医行业的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;13(1):140. doi: 10.3390/ani13010140.
高温高湿环境下关闭通风系统以扑杀猪只的案例研究。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2021 Aug 15;259(4):415-424. doi: 10.2460/javma.259.4.415.
4
Globalization and Livestock Biosecurity.全球化与家畜生物安全
Agric Res. 2014;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1007/s40003-014-0097-7. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
5
A Systematic Literature Review on Depopulation Methods for Swine.猪群扑杀方法的系统文献综述
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;10(11):2161. doi: 10.3390/ani10112161.
6
Wireless 'under the skull' epidural EEG and behavior in piglets during nitrous oxide or carbon dioxide gas euthanasia.仔猪在一氧化二氮或二氧化碳气体安乐死过程中的“颅骨下”无线硬膜外脑电图及行为
Physiol Behav. 2020 Dec 1;227:113142. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113142. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
7
Welfare of pigs during killing for purposes other than slaughter.用于非屠宰目的宰杀时猪的福利。
EFSA J. 2020 Jul 20;18(7):e06195. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6195. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
Evaluation of physical euthanasia for neonatal piglets on-farm.场内新生仔猪物理安乐死的评估。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Jul 1;98(7). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa204.
9
Humanely Ending the Life of Animals: Research Priorities to Identify Alternatives to Carbon Dioxide.人道地结束动物生命:确定二氧化碳替代方法的研究重点。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Nov 2;9(11):911. doi: 10.3390/ani9110911.
10
Risk of African swine fever virus introduction into the United States through smuggling of pork in air passenger luggage.通过航空旅客行李中走私猪肉将非洲猪瘟病毒引入美国的风险。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 8;9(1):14423. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50403-w.