Suppr超能文献

一种计算配体结合亲和力的半经验方法:对哈密顿量的依赖性及修正

A semiempirical approach to ligand-binding affinities: dependence on the Hamiltonian and corrections.

作者信息

Mikulskis Paulius, Genheden Samuel, Wichmann Karin, Ryde Ulf

机构信息

Chemical Centre, Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

J Comput Chem. 2012 May 5;33(12):1179-89. doi: 10.1002/jcc.22949. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

Abstract

We present a combination of semiempirical quantum-mechanical (SQM) calculations in the conductor-like screening model with the MM/GBSA (molecular-mechanics with generalized Born and surface-area solvation) method for ligand-binding affinity calculations. We test three SQM Hamiltonians, AM1, RM1, and PM6, as well as hydrogen-bond corrections and two different dispersion corrections. As test cases, we use the binding of seven biotin analogues to avidin, nine inhibitors to factor Xa, and nine phenol-derivatives to ferritin. The results vary somewhat for the three test cases, but a dispersion correction is mandatory to reproduce experimental estimates. On average, AM1 with the DH2 hydrogen-bond and dispersion corrections gives the best results, which are similar to those of standard MM/GBSA calculations for the same systems. The total time consumption is only 1.3-1.6 times larger than for MM/GBSA.

摘要

我们提出了一种将类导体屏蔽模型中的半经验量子力学(SQM)计算与用于配体结合亲和力计算的MM/GBSA(广义玻恩和表面积溶剂化分子力学)方法相结合的方法。我们测试了三种SQM哈密顿量,即AM1、RM1和PM6,以及氢键校正和两种不同的色散校正。作为测试案例,我们使用了七种生物素类似物与抗生物素蛋白的结合、九种抑制剂与凝血因子Xa的结合以及九种酚类衍生物与铁蛋白的结合。这三个测试案例的结果略有不同,但色散校正对于重现实验估计值是必不可少的。平均而言,采用DH2氢键和色散校正的AM1给出了最佳结果,与相同系统的标准MM/GBSA计算结果相似。总时间消耗仅比MM/GBSA大1.3 - 1.6倍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验