College of Nursing Institute, Radcliffe Infirmary, Royal, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6HE, UK.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2006 Apr;6(2):181-94. doi: 10.1586/14737167.6.2.181.
A range of terms (including quality of life, health-related quality of life and health status) describe a broad set of aspects of self-reported health that can be captured by questionnaires and related instruments. Health in older people particularly requires attention to broader aspects of the impact of health on physical, social and psychological function. A structured review was performed to assess how well such issues are measured by available instruments. A total of 45 instruments were identified that have received some degree of evaluation to establish their use in assessing the health of older individuals. Two types of instruments were included in the review: generic and older-people-specific instruments. The SF-36 has by far the largest evidence base to support its use in older people. The OMFAQ has the best evidence base amongst older-people-specific instruments. Many instruments have only minimal evidence of measurement properties. Concepts such as quality of life are still defined and used in a variety of ways, and major questions must be addressed before uniform practice emerges in this important area of health policy.
一系列术语(包括生活质量、与健康相关的生活质量和健康状况)描述了自我报告健康的广泛方面,可以通过问卷和相关工具来捕捉。老年人的健康尤其需要关注健康对身体、社会和心理功能的更广泛影响。进行了一项系统审查,以评估现有工具在多大程度上能够衡量这些问题。共确定了 45 种工具,这些工具已经经过了一定程度的评估,以确定它们在评估老年人健康方面的使用。审查包括两种类型的工具:通用工具和特定于老年人的工具。SF-36 拥有迄今为止支持其在老年人中使用的最大证据基础。OMFAQ 在特定于老年人的工具中拥有最佳的证据基础。许多工具只有关于测量特性的最初步证据。诸如生活质量之类的概念仍然以各种方式被定义和使用,在这个健康政策的重要领域出现统一做法之前,必须解决重大问题。