Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen-Denmark, Dyrlaegevej 16, Frederiksberg C., Denmark.
Acta Vet Scand. 2010 Jun 8;52(1):38. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-52-38.
During the last decade, thromboelastography (TEG) has gained increasing acceptance as a diagnostic test in veterinary medicine for evaluation of haemostasis in dogs, however the use of TEG in cats has to date only been described in one previous study and a few abstracts. The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare three different TEG assays in healthy cats, in order to establish which assay may be best suited for TEG analyses in cats.
90 TEG analyses were performed on citrated whole blood samples from 15 clinically healthy cats using assays without activator (native) or with human recombinant tissue factor (TF) or kaolin as activators. Results for reaction time (R), clotting time (K), angle (alpha), maximum amplitude (MA) and clot lysis (LY30; LY60) were recorded.
Coefficients of variation (CVs) were highest in the native assay and comparable in TF and kaolin activated assays. Significant differences were observed between native and kaolin assays for all measured parameters, between kaolin and TF for all measured parameters except LY60 and between native and TF assays for R and K.
The results indicate that TEG is a reproducible method for evaluation of haemostasis in clinically healthy cats. However, the three assays cannot be used interchangeably and the kaolin- and TF-activated assays have the lowest analytical variation indicating that using an activator may be superior for performing TEG in cats.
在过去十年中,血栓弹力描记术(TEG)作为一种诊断测试在兽医领域得到了越来越多的认可,用于评估犬的止血功能,然而,到目前为止,在猫中使用 TEG 仅在一项先前的研究和一些摘要中有所描述。本研究的目的是评估和比较三种不同的 TEG 检测方法在健康猫中的应用,以确定哪种检测方法最适合猫的 TEG 分析。
对 15 只临床健康的猫的枸橼酸盐全血样本进行了 90 次 TEG 分析,使用无激活剂(天然)或人重组组织因子(TF)或高岭土作为激活剂的检测方法。记录反应时间(R)、凝血时间(K)、角度(alpha)、最大振幅(MA)和凝块溶解(LY30;LY60)的结果。
天然检测方法的变异系数(CVs)最高,TF 和高岭土激活检测方法的 CVs 相当。天然和高岭土检测方法之间在所有测量参数上均存在显著差异,在所有测量参数上除了 LY60 之外,高岭土和 TF 之间也存在显著差异,在 R 和 K 方面,天然和 TF 之间也存在显著差异。
结果表明,TEG 是一种可重复的方法,用于评估临床健康猫的止血功能。然而,这三种检测方法不能互换使用,高岭土和 TF 激活的检测方法具有最低的分析变异,这表明在猫中使用激活剂可能更适合进行 TEG。