Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Jun 8;11:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-9.
There is a permanent need to evaluate and develop the ethical quality of scientific research and to widen knowledge about the effects of ethical issues. Therefore we evaluated whether informed consent is related to implementation and success in a lifestyle intervention study with older research participants. There is little empirical research into this topic.
The subjects (n = 597) are a subgroup of a random population sample of 1410 men and women aged 57-78 years who are participating in a 4-year randomized controlled intervention trial on the effects of physical exercise and diet on atherosclerosis, endothelial function and cognition. Data were collected in two steps: A questionnaire about informed consent was given to all willing participants (n = 1324) three months after the randomization. Data on implementation and success in the exercise and diet interventions were evaluated at 12 months by intervention-group personnel. The main purpose of the analysis procedure performed in this study was to identify and examine potential correlates for the chosen dependent variables and to generate future hypotheses for testing and confirming the independent determinants for implementation and success. The nature of the analysis protocol is exploratory at this stage.
About half of the participants (54%) had achieved good results in the intervention. Nearly half of the participants (47%) had added to or improved their own activity in some sector of exercise or diet. Significant associations were found between performance in the interventions and participants' knowledge of the purpose of the study (p < 0.001), and between success in interventions and working status (p = 0.02), and the participants' knowledge of the purpose of the study (p = 0.04).
The main finding of this study was that those participants who were most aware or had understood the purpose of the study at an early stage had also attained better results at their 12-month intervention evaluation. Therefore, implementation and success in intervention is related to whether subjects receive a sufficient amount and are able to comprehend the information provided i.e. the core principles of informed consent.
(ISRCTN 45977199).
评估和发展科研伦理质量以及拓宽对伦理问题影响的认识是一项持久的需求。因此,我们评估了知情同意是否与一项针对老年研究参与者的生活方式干预研究的实施和成功有关。关于这一主题的实证研究很少。
研究对象(n=597)是 1410 名 57-78 岁随机人群样本中的一个亚组,他们正在参加一项为期 4 年的随机对照干预试验,研究体育锻炼和饮食对动脉粥样硬化、内皮功能和认知的影响。数据收集分两步进行:在随机分组后三个月,向所有愿意参加的参与者(n=1324)发放了一份关于知情同意的问卷。在 12 个月时,干预组人员评估了运动和饮食干预的实施和成功情况。本研究中分析程序的主要目的是识别和检查所选因变量的潜在相关性,并生成未来的假设,以检验和确认实施和成功的独立决定因素。在现阶段,分析方案的性质是探索性的。
约一半的参与者(54%)在干预中取得了良好的效果。近一半的参与者(47%)在运动或饮食的某个方面增加或改善了自己的活动。研究目的知识(p < 0.001)以及干预成功与工作状态(p = 0.02)和参与者对研究目的的了解(p = 0.04)之间存在显著相关性。
本研究的主要发现是,那些在早期对研究目的最了解或理解的参与者,在 12 个月的干预评估中也取得了更好的结果。因此,干预的实施和成功与受试者是否获得足够的信息量并能够理解所提供的信息(即知情同意的核心原则)有关。
(ISRCTN 45977199)。