Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Aug;12(8):834-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq090. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
Researchers have used breath carbon monoxide (CO) cutoff values ranging from 4 to 10 ppm to define abstinence in cigarette-smoking cessation research and reductions in CO as a measure of acute abstinence in laboratory research. The current study used a reversal design to investigate effects of exhalation speed on CO output in four groups (non-, light, moderate, and heavy smokers; n = 20 per group).
In one condition, participants were instructed to empty their lungs as quickly as possible (fast), whereas in a different condition, participants were instructed to empty their lungs at a slow pace (slow). Conditions were counterbalanced and repeated twice for each participant.
For all groups, speed of exhalation was significantly lower during the slow condition than during the fast condition, and CO output was significantly higher during the slow condition than during the fast condition. Sensitivity and specificity analyses revealed that the optimal CO cutoff for smoking abstinence was 3 ppm during the fast condition versus 4 ppm during the slow condition. Additionally, when heavy smokers switched from exhaling slow to exhaling fast, they showed an approximately 30% reduction in CO.
The results suggest that exhalation speed should be monitored when CO is used as a measure of smoking status for laboratory and smoking cessation research. If exhalation speed is not monitored when using CO to verify smoking cessation, then more conservative CO cutoff values should be used to avoid false negative CO readings.
研究人员使用范围在 4 到 10ppm 的呼气一氧化碳(CO)截断值来定义戒烟研究中的戒断,并将 CO 的减少作为实验室研究中急性戒断的衡量标准。本研究使用反转设计,在四个组(非吸烟者、轻度吸烟者、中度吸烟者和重度吸烟者;每组 20 人)中研究呼气速度对 CO 输出的影响。
在一种条件下,要求参与者尽快排空肺部(快),而在另一种条件下,要求参与者以缓慢的速度排空肺部(慢)。条件是平衡和重复两次为每个参与者。
对于所有组,在慢呼气条件下的呼气速度明显低于在快呼气条件下,并且在慢呼气条件下的 CO 输出明显高于在快呼气条件下。敏感性和特异性分析表明,用于快速呼气条件下的最佳 CO 截断值为 3ppm,而用于慢速呼气条件下的最佳 CO 截断值为 4ppm。此外,当重度吸烟者从缓慢呼气改为快速呼气时,他们的 CO 减少了约 30%。
结果表明,当 CO 被用作实验室和戒烟研究中吸烟状况的衡量标准时,应监测呼气速度。如果在使用 CO 来验证戒烟时没有监测呼气速度,那么应该使用更保守的 CO 截断值,以避免假阴性的 CO 读数。