Hsieh Sophie Yahui
Ming-Chuan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(3):301-11. doi: 10.1108/09526861011029361.
The purpose of this paper is to explore hospital staff response to patient complaints and the factors influencing the response pathway.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The paper uses an exploratory study in a large Taiwanese hospital purposefully chosen as a case study site. The critical incident technique (CIT) is implemented, using a questionnaire along with non-participant observations in which the results have been triangulated. A total of 59 cases were collected.
The study found when facing "humaneness" complaints, hospital staff attempted to investigate the event and then explain the facts to the complainant or empathise with him/her and then refer the problem to the relevant unit. In response to complaints combining "communication" and "care/treatment and humaneness", staff tended to investigate the event's details and then directly explain them to the complainant. When complaints involved "care/treatment", staff tended to empathise with the complainant, investigate the facts and explain them to the complainant. Additionally, the organisational response to complaints was influenced by who made complaints; its type, severity, complaining method and patient status.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The literature revealed that the case study is the most common organisational study method. However, this approach is criticised for not offering findings that can be generalised.
Complaint nature is the major factor influencing the response pathway. If healthcare managers intend to reduce complaint rates then they need to carefully classify the complaint's nature. Different complaints have different handling procedures and guidelines to help managers resolve complaints in the first place.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: There are extensive studies focusing on investigating complaints and their resolution. These studies tend not to demonstrate various means of handling patient complaints. Neither do they describe how different complaints might lead to different outcomes. Therefore, this paper explores hospital staff response to patient complaints and the factors influencing the pathways in response to complaints.
本文旨在探讨医院工作人员对患者投诉的反应以及影响反应途径的因素。
设计/方法/途径:本文采用探索性研究,在一家大型台湾医院进行,该医院被特意选为案例研究地点。采用关键事件技术(CIT),通过问卷调查和非参与观察,并对结果进行三角验证。共收集了59个案例。
研究发现,面对“人道”投诉时,医院工作人员会试图调查事件,然后向投诉者解释事实,或对其表示同情,然后将问题提交给相关部门。对于结合了“沟通”与“护理/治疗及人道”的投诉,工作人员倾向于调查事件细节,然后直接向投诉者解释。当投诉涉及“护理/治疗”时,工作人员倾向于同情投诉者,调查事实并向其解释。此外,组织对投诉的反应受投诉者、投诉类型、严重程度、投诉方式和患者状况的影响。
研究局限性/启示:文献显示案例研究是最常见的组织研究方法。然而,这种方法因无法提供可推广性的研究结果而受到批评。
投诉性质是影响反应途径的主要因素。如果医疗管理人员想要降低投诉率,就需要仔细分类投诉性质。不同的投诉有不同的处理程序和指导方针,以帮助管理人员首先解决投诉。
原创性/价值:有大量研究专注于调查投诉及其解决方式。这些研究往往没有展示处理患者投诉的各种方式。它们也没有描述不同投诉如何可能导致不同结果。因此,本文探讨了医院工作人员对患者投诉的反应以及影响投诉反应途径的因素。