Vallerand A L, Michas R D, Frim J, Ackles K N
Biosciences Division, Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, North York, Ont., Canada.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1991 May;62(5):383-91.
The goals of this study were, first, to determine the extent of the heat strain induced by wearing the Canadian Forces (CF) aircrew chemical defence individual protection ensemble (CD IPE) under simulated hot cockpit conditions, and second, to determine the effectiveness of a liquid cooled (LC) and an air-cooled (AC) vest in relieving such heat strain. Seven (7) healthy male subjects were subjected to three heat exposures (37 degrees C, 50% r.h., for 150 min, time-weighted metabolic rate of about 240 W, 1 week apart) either with no cooling (NC), LC or AC vests. NC was only tolerated for 95 +/- 5 min, whereas all subjects completed the 150-min tests with AC or LC (p less than 0.01). The large rate of increase in rectal temperature (Tre) during NC (1.00 +/- 0.05 degrees C/h) was attenuated by 51% with LC and by an even greater amount with AC (64%, p less than 0.01). NC entailed a sweat rate of almost 1 kg/h, which was reduced 38% by LC and 51% by AC (p less than 0.01). The combined dry and evaporative heat losses (HEKC of LC and AC vests were significantly greater than that of NC (164 +/- 7 and 181 +/- 9 vs. 124 +/- 9 W, respectively; p less than 0.01). The results demonstrate that subjects wearing CF aircrew IPE under simulated hot cockpit conditions can only tolerate 95 min of the 150-min test, and experience significant heat strain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目标是,第一,确定在模拟炎热驾驶舱条件下穿着加拿大军队(CF)空勤人员化学防御个人防护套装(CD IPE)所引起的热应激程度,第二,确定液体冷却(LC)背心和空气冷却(AC)背心缓解这种热应激的有效性。七名健康男性受试者分别在不使用冷却装备(NC)、使用LC背心或AC背心的情况下,接受三次热暴露(37摄氏度,相对湿度50%,持续150分钟,时间加权代谢率约为240瓦,间隔1周)。NC组仅能耐受95±5分钟,而所有受试者使用AC或LC背心均完成了150分钟的测试(p<0.01)。NC组期间直肠温度(Tre)的大幅上升速率(1.00±0.05摄氏度/小时)在使用LC背心时降低了51%,使用AC背心时降低幅度更大(64%,p<0.01)。NC组的出汗速率接近1千克/小时,使用LC背心时降低了38%,使用AC背心时降低了51%(p<0.01)。LC和AC背心的干热和蒸发热损失总和(HEKC)显著高于NC组(分别为164±7瓦和181±9瓦,而NC组为124±9瓦;p<0.01)。结果表明,在模拟炎热驾驶舱条件下穿着CF空勤人员IPE的受试者在150分钟测试中只能耐受95分钟,并经历显著的热应激。(摘要截短至250字)