Suppr超能文献

穿着核生化防护服进行轻度和重度运动时空气冷却和液体冷却的效果。

Efficacy of air and liquid cooling during light and heavy exercise while wearing NBC clothing.

作者信息

McLellan T M, Frim J, Bell D G

机构信息

Human Protection and Performance Sector, Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, North York, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Aug;70(8):802-11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies, to date, have not revealed the extent to which the heat strain of continuous heavy exercise while wearing NBC protective clothing can be reduced by providing liquid- or air-cooling and whether one system is more effective than the other in aiding heat transfer from the body and the clothing. It was of interest to know to what extent present-day cooling technologies can reduce the heat strain of light and heavy exercise in NBC clothing and to compare these reductions to other strategies that have employed changes in clothing design.

HYPOTHESIS

It was hypothesized that there would be no difference between the liquid and air cooling systems and that sufficient cooling power would be delivered to the body to reduce the heat strain of heavy exercise to a level similar to that experienced with light exercise when no cooling was provided.

METHODS

Eight males performed 6 randomized exposures for a maximum of 3 h at 40 degrees C and 30% relative humidity that involved either light (L) (walking at 3.5 km x h(-1) or heavy (H) (walking at 4.8 km x h(-1) and a 5% grade) exercise while wearing the NBC protective clothing ensemble with no cooling (N), liquid (L) or air (A) cooling.

RESULTS

For L exercise, tolerance time was significantly increased from 100 min with N to the maximum of 3 h with either cooling system. There was no difference between L and A cooling in the extent of the changes in rectal temperature, heart rate and heat flow. For H exercise, tolerance time was significantly increased 150% from 57 min with N to 149 min with L and 140 min with A. These latter values for HL and HA were not different from each other but both were significantly greater than L exercise with N. Rectal temperature increased more quickly during HL compared with HA during the first 60 min of exposure but there were no differences between cooling trials for the remainder of the heat exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that sufficient cooling power could be delivered to the body to effectively reduce the heat strain of wearing NBC protective clothing during heavy exercise in a hot environment to a level comparable to or slightly lower than that experienced with light exercise and no cooling.

摘要

背景

迄今为止的研究尚未揭示,在穿着核生化防护服进行持续剧烈运动时,通过提供液体冷却或空气冷却能在多大程度上减轻热应激,以及在促进身体与衣物之间的热量传递方面,一种系统是否比另一种更有效。了解当今的冷却技术能在多大程度上减轻穿着核生化防护服进行轻度和剧烈运动时的热应激,并将这些降温效果与采用服装设计改变的其他策略进行比较,是很有意义的。

假设

假设液体冷却系统和空气冷却系统之间没有差异,并且能够向身体提供足够的冷却能力,将剧烈运动时的热应激降低到与不提供冷却时轻度运动所经历的水平相似。

方法

八名男性在40摄氏度、相对湿度30%的环境下进行了6次随机暴露,每次最长3小时,包括穿着核生化防护服进行轻度(L)(以3.5公里/小时的速度行走)或剧烈(H)(以4.8公里/小时的速度行走且坡度为5%)运动,且分别处于无冷却(N)、液体冷却(L)或空气冷却(A)的条件下。

结果

对于轻度运动,耐受时间从无冷却时的100分钟显著增加到两种冷却系统下的最长3小时。在直肠温度、心率和热流的变化程度方面,液体冷却和空气冷却之间没有差异。对于剧烈运动,耐受时间从无冷却时的57分钟显著增加了150%,液体冷却时为149分钟,空气冷却时为140分钟。液体冷却剧烈运动(HL)和空气冷却剧烈运动(HA)的后两个值彼此没有差异,但均显著高于无冷却情况下的轻度运动。在暴露的前60分钟内,与空气冷却剧烈运动(HA)相比,液体冷却剧烈运动(HL)时直肠温度升高得更快,但在其余热暴露时间内,各冷却试验之间没有差异。

结论

得出的结论是,能够向身体提供足够的冷却能力,可以有效地将在炎热环境中穿着核生化防护服进行剧烈运动时的热应激降低到与轻度运动且无冷却时相当或略低的水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验