Heled Yuval, Epstein Yoram, Moran Daniel S
Heller Institute of Medical Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 May;75(5):391-6.
While wearing impermeable nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) clothing, reduction of thermal stress is of primary importance. We compared the effect between two cooling methods on the attenuation of heat strain.
There were six male subjects who were divided into two groups of three and exposed on two consecutive days to 125 min of exercise in a high heat load (40 degrees C, 40% RH) wearing NBC clothing. They were cooled by one of two different cooling methods: an active cooling vest (CV) based on the sublimation of dry ice, or tap water spraying (TP).
After 2 h, rectal temperature (Tre) was significantly higher for the CV compared with the TP (38.1 +/- 0.04 degrees C vs. 37.7 +/- 0.10 degrees C, respectively). Skin temperature (Tsk) was significantly higher for the CV compared with the TP (36.60 +/- 0.54 degrees C vs. 34.90 +/- 0.35 degrees C, respectively). In the second hour, heart rate (HR) was significantly higher for CV compared with TP (118 +/- 13 bpm vs. 104 +/- 64 bpm, respectively). Heat storage was significantly higher after the first and second hours for the CV compared with the TP. The physiological strain index (PSI) was higher for CV compared with TP in the second hour. Sweat rate (msw) was significantly higher for CV compared with TP (560 +/- 45 g x h(-1) vs. 409 +/- 84 g x h(-1), respectively). Subjective thermal comfort was not significantly different.
TP was more effective than the CV in reducing heat strain under the conditions used in the study. Until a significant breakthrough in reducing heat strain while wearing NBC clothing in field conditions can be found, TP appears to be an effective and recommended cooling method.
在穿着不透水的核、生物和化学(NBC)防护服时,减轻热应激至关重要。我们比较了两种冷却方法对热应激减轻效果的影响。
六名男性受试者被分为两组,每组三人,连续两天在高温负荷(40℃,40%相对湿度)下穿着NBC防护服进行125分钟的运动。他们通过两种不同的冷却方法之一进行冷却:基于干冰升华的主动冷却背心(CV),或自来水喷洒(TP)。
2小时后,CV组的直肠温度(Tre)显著高于TP组(分别为38.1±0.04℃和37.7±0.10℃)。CV组的皮肤温度(Tsk)显著高于TP组(分别为36.60±0.54℃和34.90±0.35℃)。在第二个小时,CV组的心率(HR)显著高于TP组(分别为118±13次/分钟和104±64次/分钟)。与TP组相比,CV组在第一个小时和第二个小时后的蓄热量显著更高。在第二个小时,CV组的生理应激指数(PSI)高于TP组。CV组的出汗率(msw)显著高于TP组(分别为560±45克/小时和409±84克/小时)。主观热舒适度无显著差异。
在本研究使用的条件下,TP在减轻热应激方面比CV更有效。在野外条件下穿着NBC防护服时,在减轻热应激方面取得重大突破之前,TP似乎是一种有效且推荐的冷却方法。