Marginalia: comparing adjusted effect measures.
作者信息
Kaufman Jay S
出版信息
Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21(4):490-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e00730.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Marginalia: comparing adjusted effect measures.旁注：比较调整后的效应量度
Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21(4):490-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e00730.
2
The relationship between neighborhood poverty and alcohol use: estimation by marginal structural models.邻里贫困与饮酒之间的关系：边际结构模型的估计。
Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21(4):482-9. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e13539.
3
Modeling the distribution and consequences of alcohol consumption.模拟酒精消费的分布及其后果。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Apr;22(2 Suppl):44S-51S. doi: 10.1097/00000374-199802001-00007.
4
A population-based study of premature mortality in relation to neighbourhood density of alcohol sales and cheque cashing outlets in Toronto, Canada.基于人群的研究：加拿大多伦多地区酒类销售和支票兑现点的社区密度与过早死亡的关系。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 17;4(12):e006032. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006032.
5
The analysis of ordinal agreement data: beyond weighted kappa.有序一致性数据的分析：超越加权kappa系数
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Sep;46(9):1055-62. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90173-x.
6
Neighborhood Typologies Associated with Alcohol Use among Adults in Their 30s: a Finite Mixture Modeling Approach.与 30 多岁成年人饮酒相关的邻里类型学：有限混合模型方法。
J Urban Health. 2017 Aug;94(4):542-548. doi: 10.1007/s11524-017-0161-2.
7
Social inequalities in alcohol consumption in the Czech Republic: a multilevel analysis.捷克共和国饮酒方面的社会不平等现象：一项多层次分析。
Health Place. 2010 May;16(3):590-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
8
Problem Drinking, Alcohol-Related Violence, and Homelessness among Youth Living in the Slums of Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟青年的问题饮酒、与酒精相关的暴力行为和无家可归问题。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 24;15(6):1061. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061061.
9
Area level deprivation and drinking patterns among adolescents.地区贫困程度与青少年饮酒模式。
Health Place. 2013 Jan;19:53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
10
Nature, prevalence and risk factors of alcohol use in an urban slum of Southern India.印度南部城市贫民窟中酒精使用的性质、患病率及风险因素。
Natl Med J India. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):203-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Association Between Oral Malodor and Dementia: An 11-Year Follow-Up Study in Japan.口腔异味与痴呆症之间的关联：日本一项为期11年的随访研究。
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2024 May 17;8(1):805-816. doi: 10.3233/ADR-240015. eCollection 2024.
2
Model-based standardization using multiple imputation.基于模型的标准化方法：多重插补。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Feb 10;24(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02157-x.
3
Causal inference using observational intensive care unit data: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice.利用重症监护病房观察性数据进行因果推断：一项范围综述及对未来实践的建议。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Nov 27;6(1):221. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00961-1.
4
Analysis approaches to address treatment nonadherence in pragmatic trials with point-treatment settings: a simulation study.解决具有点治疗设置的实用临床试验中治疗不依从性的分析方法：一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Feb 16;22(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01518-8.
5
Insomnia symptoms as a cause of type 2 diabetes Incidence: a 20 year cohort study.失眠症状作为2型糖尿病的一个病因：一项20年队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1268-4.
6
Comparison of statistical approaches dealing with time-dependent confounding in drug effectiveness studies.处理药物有效性研究中时变混杂的统计方法比较。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1709-1722. doi: 10.1177/0962280216668554. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
7
Statin adherence and risk of acute cardiovascular events among women: a cohort study accounting for time-dependent confounding affected by previous adherence.女性中他汀类药物的依从性与急性心血管事件风险：一项考虑既往依从性所影响的时间依赖性混杂因素的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 3;6(6):e011306. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011306.
8
Confounding, effect modification, and the odds ratio: common misinterpretations.混杂因素、效应修饰与比值比：常见误解
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):470-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
9
Worth the weight: using inverse probability weighted Cox models in AIDS research.物有所值：在艾滋病研究中使用逆概率加权Cox模型
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2014 Dec;30(12):1170-7. doi: 10.1089/AID.2014.0037.
10
Estimation of the standardized risk difference and ratio in a competing risks framework: application to injection drug use and progression to AIDS after initiation of antiretroviral therapy.在竞争风险框架下估计标准化风险差异和比率：应用于注射吸毒及开始抗逆转录病毒治疗后进展为艾滋病的情况。
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 15;181(4):238-45. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu122. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
本文引用的文献
1
The relationship between neighborhood poverty and alcohol use: estimation by marginal structural models.邻里贫困与饮酒之间的关系：边际结构模型的估计。
Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21(4):482-9. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e13539.
2
Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.构建边际结构模型的逆概率权重。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 15;168(6):656-64. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn164. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
3
Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.边际结构模型作为一种标准化工具。
Epidemiology. 2003 Nov;14(6):680-6. doi: 10.1097/01.EDE.0000081989.82616.7d.
4
Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on time to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or death using marginal structural models.使用边际结构模型评估高效抗逆转录病毒疗法对获得性免疫缺陷综合征发生时间或死亡时间的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Oct 1;158(7):687-94. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg206.
5
Confounding in health research.健康研究中的混杂因素。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:189-212. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.189.
6
Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.边缘结构模型与流行病学中的因果推断
Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):550-60. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011.
7
Re: "Confounding Confounding".关于：“混杂因素的混杂情况”
Am J Epidemiol. 1989 May;129(5):1086-91. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115216.
8
Stratification by a multivariate confounder score.通过多变量混杂因素评分进行分层。
Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Dec;104(6):609-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112339.
Zotero 插件