• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

棘突间植入物联合单侧椎板切开术用于老年患者退变性腰椎管狭窄症的双侧减压

Interspinous implant with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients.

作者信息

Ryu Sung-Joo, Kim In-Soo

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010 May;47(5):338-44. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.338. Epub 2010 May 31.

DOI:10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.338
PMID:20539792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2883053/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the safety and efficacy of one level unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression (ULBD) with the placement of a device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) compared with one level ULBD only in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).

METHODS

A non randomized prospective analysis was performed on 16 patients who underwent one level ULBD with DIAM (Group A) and 20 patients with one level ULBD only (Group B) between February 2007 and March 2008. Radiographic imaging, visual analog scale (VAS) and MacNab outcome scale were obtained before and after surgery at a mean interval of 21 months (range 17-27 months).

RESULTS

The disc height, interpedicular distance, slip distance and segmental lordotic angle were similar between two groups. In the group A, there was no significant difference between the pre- and post-operative imaging in terms of the sagittal balance and disc height. Both groups showed significant improvement in the clinical outcomes. In addition, there was significantly less low-back pain in the group A than in the group B at the last follow up, while the clinical improvement of the leg pain and MacNab outcome scale showed no significant difference in the two groups. There were no major complications or DIAM associated complications.

CONCLUSION

ULBD with DIAM is a safe and efficacious treatment for selective elderly patients with DLSS, particularly for relieving low back pain comparing to ULBD. ULBD with DIAM did not alter the disc height or sagittal alignment at the mean 21 months follow-up interval.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了在老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)患者中,与单纯单节段单侧椎板切开双侧减压术(ULBD)相比,单节段单侧椎板切开双侧减压术联合椎间辅助运动装置(DIAM)置入的安全性和有效性。

方法

对2007年2月至2008年3月间接受单节段ULBD联合DIAM治疗的16例患者(A组)和单纯接受单节段ULBD治疗的20例患者(B组)进行了非随机前瞻性分析。在术前和术后平均间隔21个月(范围17 - 27个月)时获取影像学资料、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和MacNab疗效评定量表。

结果

两组间椎间盘高度、椎弓根间距、滑脱距离和节段性前凸角相似。在A组,矢状面平衡和椎间盘高度的术前和术后影像学表现无显著差异。两组的临床疗效均有显著改善。此外,在末次随访时,A组的下腰痛明显少于B组,而两组在腿痛的临床改善和MacNab疗效评定量表方面无显著差异。未发生重大并发症或与DIAM相关的并发症。

结论

对于选择性老年DLSS患者,ULBD联合DIAM是一种安全有效的治疗方法,特别是与ULBD相比,在缓解下腰痛方面效果更佳。在平均21个月的随访期内,ULBD联合DIAM未改变椎间盘高度或矢状面排列。

相似文献

1
Interspinous implant with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients.棘突间植入物联合单侧椎板切开术用于老年患者退变性腰椎管狭窄症的双侧减压
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010 May;47(5):338-44. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.338. Epub 2010 May 31.
2
Outcome analysis of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in patients with degenerative lumbar central canal stenosis.退变性腰椎中央管狭窄症双侧减压的腰椎内镜单侧椎板切开术的疗效分析。
Spine J. 2021 Jan;21(1):122-133. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
3
Radiological Outcomes of Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Discectomy.单侧椎板切开术治疗腰椎管狭窄症伴或不伴椎间盘切除术的双侧减压的放射学结果。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e1307-e1314. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.124. Epub 2023 May 8.
4
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.腰椎内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症伴退行性椎体滑脱的临床疗效比较
Front Surg. 2021 Feb 26;7:596327. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.596327. eCollection 2020.
5
A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).两种用于腰椎管狭窄症的微创减压手术的前瞻性对比研究:双侧减压单侧椎板切开术(ULBD)与保留肌肉的椎间孔减压术(MILD)。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Feb 15;39(4):332-40. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000136.
6
Full-endoscopic versus microscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis at L4-L5: comparative study.全内镜与显微镜下单侧椎板切开术治疗 L4-L5 双侧腰椎管狭窄症:对比研究。
Int Orthop. 2022 Dec;46(12):2887-2895. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05549-0. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
7
Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Provides Comparable Clinical Outcomes in Patients with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.腰椎内窥镜单侧椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症伴或不伴退行性脊椎滑脱的双侧减压可获得相似的临床效果。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;150:e361-e371. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
[The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].[用于治疗腰骶部脊柱退行性疾病的DIAM脊柱稳定系统]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Oct;76(5):417-23.
9
Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Decompression: A Case Series Studying One- and Two-Year Outcomes with Predictors of Minimal Clinical Improvement.单侧椎板切除术联合双侧减压:一项研究一年和两年结局的病例系列研究,探讨了微小临床改善的预测因素。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e290-e297. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.144. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.全内窥镜与微创减压治疗退行性脊柱侧凸与脊柱滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E16. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS195.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of interspinous process device compared with alone decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较棘突间装置与单纯减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38370. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038370.
2
Validity of outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials and observational studies in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.用于退行性腰椎管狭窄症随机临床试验和观察性研究的结局测量的有效性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 19;13(1):1068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27218-3.
3
Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.腰椎管狭窄症最有效的治疗方法是什么:减压、融合还是棘突间装置?一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
J Orthop Translat. 2020 Sep 26;26:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.07.003. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Herniectomy versus herniectomy with the DIAM spinal stabilization system in patients with sciatica and concomitant low back pain: results of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial.坐骨神经痛合并下腰痛患者行疝修补术与使用DIAM脊柱稳定系统的疝修补术:一项前瞻性随机对照多中心试验的结果
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):865-876. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4796-6. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
5
The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy.与椎板切除术相比,动态和静态棘突间撑开器治疗腰椎管狭窄症的成本效益。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Mar 6;30:339. eCollection 2016.
6
Interspinous process stabilization with Rocker via unilateral approach versus X-Stop via bilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study.经单侧入路使用摇椅式装置与经双侧入路使用X-Stop装置进行棘突间稳定术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Nov 1;16:328. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0786-9.
7
[Interspinous implant "InSWing®" for the lumbar spine].
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Nov;22(5-6):512-23. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-9035-4.

本文引用的文献

1
[Surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis by different methods].
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009 Oct;22(10):738-40.
2
Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome?用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症的棘突间植入物(X Stop、Wallis、Diam):放射学参数与临床结果之间存在相关性吗?
Eur Spine J. 2009 Oct;18(10):1494-503. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1081-y. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
3
Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?Wallis植入物能否减少腰骶部器械融合上方相邻节段的退变?
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):830-40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0976-y. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
4
Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion.一种新型棘突间植入物对腰椎活动范围的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2009 May;18(5):696-703. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0890-3. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
5
Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 21;358(8):794-810. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136.
6
Pathomechanism of loss of elasticity and hypertrophy of lumbar ligamentum flavum in elderly patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.老年腰椎管狭窄症患者黄韧带弹性丧失及肥厚的发病机制
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 1;32(25):2805-11. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b650f.
7
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression.退行性腰椎管狭窄症:374例行单侧椎板切开双侧显微减压术患者的结果分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Dec;7(6):579-86. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/12/579.
8
Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes.有症状的腰椎退行性疾病的融合手术与非手术治疗:Oswestry功能障碍指数和MOS 36项简短健康调查结果的系统评价
Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):747-55. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.013. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
9
Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation.用于后路稳定的动态棘突间撑开器技术:1年随访评估中关于安全性、矢状面成角和疼痛结局的病例对照研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2007 Jan 15;22(1):E7.
10
Device for intervertebral assisted motion: technique and initial results.椎间辅助运动装置:技术与初步结果
Neurosurg Focus. 2007 Jan 15;22(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/foc.2007.22.1.6.