Health Services Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Canada.
J Interprof Care. 2010 Jul;24(4):350-61. doi: 10.3109/13561820903550713.
Interprofessional communication and collaboration are promoted by policymakers as fundamental building blocks for improving patient safety and meeting the demands of increasingly complex care. This paper reports qualitative findings of an interprofessional intervention designed to improve communication and collaboration between different professions in general internal medicine (GIM) hospital wards in Canada. The intervention promoted self-introduction by role and profession to a collaborating colleague in relation to the shared patient, a question or communication regarding the patient, to be followed by an explicit request for feedback from the partner professional. Implementation and uptake of the intervention were evaluated using qualitative methods, including 90 hours of ethnographic observations and interviews collected in both intervention and comparison wards. Documentary data were also collected and analysed. Fieldnotes and interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically. Our findings suggested that the intervention did not produce the anticipated changes in communication and collaboration between health professionals, and allowed us to identify barriers to the implementation of effective collaboration interventions. Despite initially offering verbal support, senior physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals minimally explained the intervention to their junior colleagues and rarely role-modelled or reiterated support for it. Professional resistances as well as the fast paced, interruptive environment reduced opportunities or incentive to enhance restrictive interprofessional relationships. In a healthcare setting where face-to-face spontaneous interprofessional communication is not hostile but is rare and impersonal, the perceived benefits of improvement are insufficient to implement simple and potentially beneficial communication changes, in the face of habit, and absence of continued senior clinician and management support.
政策制定者提倡跨专业沟通与协作,认为这是提高患者安全和满足日益复杂的医疗需求的基础。本文报告了一项跨专业干预措施的定性研究结果,该措施旨在改善加拿大综合内科(GIM)医院病房中不同专业之间的沟通与协作。该干预措施提倡在与共享患者相关的情况下,通过角色和专业自我介绍给协作同事,提出与患者相关的问题或沟通,然后明确请求合作伙伴专业人员提供反馈。干预措施的实施和采用采用了定性方法进行评估,包括在干预病房和对照病房中收集的 90 小时的民族志观察和访谈。还收集和分析了文件数据。现场记录和访谈被转录并进行了主题分析。我们的研究结果表明,该干预措施并没有在卫生专业人员之间产生预期的沟通和协作变化,使我们能够确定有效协作干预措施实施的障碍。尽管资深医生、护士和辅助医疗专业人员最初口头表示支持,但他们很少向初级同事解释干预措施,也很少对此进行角色扮演或重申支持。专业抵制以及快节奏、中断的环境减少了增强限制性跨专业关系的机会或动力。在医疗保健环境中,面对面的自发跨专业沟通不是敌对的,但很少见且不人性化,因此,面对习惯和缺乏持续的高级临床医生和管理层的支持,改善沟通的预期收益不足以实施简单而又可能有益的沟通改变。