Suppr超能文献

眶周接触致敏。

Periorbital contact sensitization.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep;150(3):366-370.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.03.026. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify frequency and pattern of contact sensitization among patients with periorbital dermatitis.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional retrospective investigation of 1247 patients referred for patch testing over a 17-year period.

METHODS

Data were collected for patients undergoing patch testing to the standard and customized trays between January 1990 and December 2006 at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Contact Dermatitis Clinic. Our study group consisted of 266 patients affected by periorbital dermatitis. Findings were compared to 981 referrals without periorbital dermatitis (controls). Patch test results were read after 48 and 72 hours and classified as allergic, questionable, irritant, or negative. Statistical analyses were carried out by using chi(2) test and Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

General epidemiologic data among periorbital dermatitis patients showed significant predominance of female gender (87.6%) and of individuals aged 40 to 59 years (45.9%). Nickel (16.5%) and fragrance mix (13.2%) were the top-ranking sensitizers. Ingredients of topical ophthalmologic products did not result in significant sensitization. Comparison of the periorbital dermatitis group to the controls did not reveal significant differences in sensitization pattern. Patch testing confirmed the likelihood of allergic contact dermatitis in 50.8% of the periorbital dermatitis patients tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergic contact dermatitis is a common cause of periorbital dermatitis. Patch testing should be considered in all patients with periorbital dermatitis when suspecting contact allergy in order to identify and avoid offending allergens.

摘要

目的

确定眶周皮炎患者接触致敏的频率和模式。

设计

对 17 年间(1990 年 1 月至 2006 年 12 月)在马萨诸塞州总医院接触性皮炎诊所进行标准和定制斑贴试验的 1247 例患者进行的回顾性横断面研究。

方法

收集在马萨诸塞州总医院接触性皮炎诊所进行标准和定制斑贴试验的患者的数据。我们的研究组由 266 例眶周皮炎患者组成。将研究结果与 981 例无眶周皮炎的转诊患者(对照组)进行比较。斑贴试验结果在 48 和 72 小时后进行读取,并分类为过敏、可疑、刺激或阴性。通过使用卡方检验和 Fisher 确切检验进行统计学分析。

结果

眶周皮炎患者的一般流行病学数据显示,女性(87.6%)和 40 至 59 岁(45.9%)的个体显著占优势。镍(16.5%)和香料混合物(13.2%)是排名最高的致敏原。局部眼科产品的成分并未导致明显的致敏。眶周皮炎组与对照组的比较未显示致敏模式的显著差异。斑贴试验证实了 50.8%接受测试的眶周皮炎患者发生过敏性接触性皮炎的可能性。

结论

过敏性接触性皮炎是眶周皮炎的常见原因。当怀疑接触过敏时,应考虑对所有眶周皮炎患者进行斑贴试验,以识别和避免致敏原。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验