Suppr超能文献

[尿比重的比较测量:试剂条法、折射计法和比重计法]

[Comparative measurement of urine specific gravity: reagent strips, refractometry and hydrometry].

作者信息

Costa Christian Elías, Bettendorff Carolina, Bupo Sol, Ayuso Sandra, Vallejo Graciela

机构信息

Unidad de Nefrología, Hospital de Niños Ricardo Gutiérrez.

出版信息

Arch Argent Pediatr. 2010 Jun;108(3):234-8. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752010000300009.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The urine specific gravity is commonly used in clinical practice to measure the renal concentration/dilution ability. Measurement can be performed by three methods: hydrometry, refractometry and reagent strips.

AIM

To assess the accuracy of different methods to measure urine specific gravity.

METHODS

We analyzed 156 consecutive urine samples of pediatric patients during April and May 2007. Urine specific gravity was measured by hydrometry (UD), refractometry (RE) and reagent strips (TR), simultaneously. Urine osmolarity was considered as the gold standard and was measured by freezing point depression. Correlation between different methods was calculated by simple linear regression.

RESULTS

A positive and acceptable correlation was found with osmolarity for the RE as for the UD (r= 0.81 and r= 0.86, respectively). The reagent strips presented low correlation (r= 0.46). Also, we found good correlation between measurements obtained by UD and RE (r= 0.89). Measurements obtained by TR, however, had bad correlation when compared to UD (r= 0.46). Higher values of specific gravity were observed when measured with RE with respect to UD.

CONCLUSIONS

Reagent strips are not reliable for measuring urine specific gravity and should not be used as an usual test. However, hydrometry and refractometry are acceptable alternatives for measuring urine specific gravity, as long as the same method is used for follow-up.

摘要

引言

尿比重在临床实践中常用于测量肾脏的浓缩/稀释能力。测量方法有三种:比重计法、折射计法和试带法。

目的

评估不同方法测量尿比重的准确性。

方法

我们分析了2007年4月和5月期间156例儿科患者的连续尿液样本。同时采用比重计法(UD)、折射计法(RE)和试带法(TR)测量尿比重。尿渗透压被视为金标准,采用冰点降低法进行测量。通过简单线性回归计算不同方法之间的相关性。

结果

RE和UD与渗透压之间均存在正相关且相关性可接受(r分别为0.81和0.86)。试带法的相关性较低(r = 0.46)。此外,我们发现UD和RE测量结果之间具有良好的相关性(r = 0.89)。然而,与UD相比,TR测量结果的相关性较差(r = 0.46)。与UD相比,用RE测量时观察到更高的比重值。

结论

试带法测量尿比重不可靠,不应作为常规检测方法使用。然而,只要在随访中使用相同的方法,比重计法和折射计法是测量尿比重的可接受替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验