Suppr超能文献

总固体折射法与试带法尿比重值的比较。

Comparison of urine specific gravity values from total-solids refractometry and reagent strip method.

作者信息

Chatasingh S, Tapaneya-Olarn W

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 1989 Jan;72 Suppl 1:39-41.

PMID:2732645
Abstract

The comparison of specific gravity values of 561 urine samples from TS meter and reagent strip was made. The data were divided into two groups: group 1-less than 2+ protein contained urine samples and group 2--equal or more than 2+ protein contained urine samples. The results revealed that the specific gravity values from both methods in both groups were statistically different (p less than 0.01) but they were correlated at r = 0.84 (p less than 0.001) and r = 0.73 (p less than 0.001) in group 1 and group 2, respectively. It was concluded that the reagent strip is suitable for use as a screening test but it should not be considered when precise measurement is necessary.

摘要

对561份尿液样本用TS计和试带法进行了比重值比较。数据分为两组:第1组——蛋白质含量低于2+的尿液样本,第2组——蛋白质含量等于或高于2+的尿液样本。结果显示,两组中两种方法的比重值在统计学上均有差异(p<0.01),但第1组和第2组中两种方法的比重值分别在r = 0.84(p<0.001)和r = 0.73(p<0.001)水平上具有相关性。结论是,试带法适用于筛查,但在需要精确测量时不应采用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and analytical validation of a handheld digital refractometer for urine specific gravity measurement.
Pract Lab Med. 2016 Jun 2;5:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2016.06.001. eCollection 2016 Aug 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验