Shahgaldi Kambiz, Manouras Aristomenis, Brodin Lars-Åke, Winter Reidar
Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Echocardiography. 2010 Oct;27(9):1078-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01197.x.
The aim of the study was to investigate whether left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) assessment using direct measurement of left ventricular outflow tract area (LVOT(A)) is superior to conventional methods for SV calculation.
Thirty patients were included in the study (39 ± 12 years). LVSV was assessed by multiplying LVOT velocity time integral (VTI) by LVOT(A) provided by direct planimetrical measurements from real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) in biplane mode (SV₂). These measurements were compared to conventional methods using either the LVOT diameter for LVOT(A) multiplied with VTI (SV₁) or biplane Simpson (SV₃). Direct SV measurements by RT3DE were used as gold standard (SV(ref)). There was an excellent correlation and agreement between SV determined by SV₂ and 3DE (r = 0.98, mean difference 0.5 ± 3.3 mL). However, the concordance of the traditional methods (SV₁ and SV₃) with 3DE was weaker (r = 0.38, mean difference -2.0 ± 17.6 mL, r = 0.84, mean difference -7.6 ± 8.7 mL, respectively). Furthermore, cardiac output (CO) measurements performed by the different modalities were not concordant with wide limits of agreement, except by SV₂ the mean difference of CO by SV₁ was -0.12 ± 1.05 L/min, 0.03 ± 0.20 L/min by SV₂, and -0.45 ± 0.52 L/min by SV₃.
SV and CO calculations using direct measurement of LVOT area is a feasible, accurate and reproducible method and correlates extremely well with 3DE volume measurements. SV and CO calculation by LVOT(A) is therefore an appealing method for LVSV assessment in clinical routine.
本研究旨在探讨通过直接测量左心室流出道面积(LVOT(A))评估左心室每搏输出量(LVSV)是否优于传统的每搏输出量计算方法。
30例患者纳入研究(年龄39±12岁)。在双平面模式下,通过实时三维超声心动图(RT3DE)直接平面测量获得LVOT面积,将LVOT速度时间积分(VTI)与该面积相乘来评估LVSV(SV₂)。这些测量结果与使用LVOT直径计算LVOT面积并乘以VTI的传统方法(SV₁)或双平面辛普森法(SV₃)进行比较。将RT3DE直接测量的每搏输出量用作金标准(SV(ref))。SV₂测定的每搏输出量与3DE测定的结果具有极好的相关性和一致性(r = 0.98,平均差值0.5±3.3 mL)。然而,传统方法(SV₁和SV₃)与3DE的一致性较弱(r分别为0.38,平均差值 -2.0±17.6 mL;r = 0.84,平均差值 -7.6±8.7 mL)。此外,不同方法测量的心输出量(CO)不一致,一致性界限较宽,除了SV₂,SV₁测量的CO平均差值为 -0.12±1.05 L/min,SV₂为0.03±0.20 L/min,SV₃为 -0.45±0.52 L/min。
通过直接测量LVOT面积计算每搏输出量和心输出量是一种可行、准确且可重复的方法,与3DE容积测量结果相关性极佳。因此,通过LVOT(A)计算每搏输出量和心输出量是临床常规评估LVSV的一种有吸引力的方法。