Suppr超能文献

使用连续血糖监测评估伴和不伴低血糖意识受损的 1 型糖尿病成人患者的生化性低血糖发作频率:无明显差异。

Frequency of biochemical hypoglycaemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes with and without impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia: no identifiable differences using continuous glucose monitoring.

机构信息

Academic Department of Diabetes, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2010 Jun;27(6):666-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03006.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) is a major risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes. Although biochemical hypoglycaemia is asserted to be more frequent in IAH, this has not been estimated accurately. The aim of this study was to use Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) to quantify hypoglycaemia in IAH and evaluate its use in identifying impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia.

METHODS

Ninety-five patients with Type 1 diabetes were classified as having normal (n = 74) or impaired awareness (n = 21) using an established method of assessing hypoglycaemia awareness. Hypoglycaemia exposure was assessed prospectively over 9-12 months using weekly 4-point capillary home blood glucose monitoring (HBGM), 5 days of CGM and prospective reporting of severe hypoglycaemia. The frequencies of biochemical and severe hypoglycaemia were compared in patients with normal and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia.

RESULTS

Patients with impaired awareness had a 3-fold higher incidence of severe hypoglycaemia than those with normal awareness [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 3.37 (95% CI 1.30-8.7); P = 0.01] and 1.6-fold higher incidence of hypoglycaemia on weekly HBGM [IRR 1.63 (95% CI 1.09-2.44); P = 0.02]. No significant differences were observed with CGM [IRR for sensor glucose < or = 3.0 mmol/l 1.47 (95% CI 0.91-2.39); P = 0.12; IRR for sensor glucose < or = 2.2 mmol/l 1.23 (95% CI 0.76-1.98); P = 0.40].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Type 1 diabetes with impaired awareness had a 3-fold higher risk of severe hypoglycaemia and 1.6-fold higher incidence of biochemical hypoglycaemia measured with weekly glucose monitoring compared with normal awareness, but 5 days of CGM did not differentiate those with impaired from those with normal awareness.

摘要

目的

意识受损性低血糖(IAH)是 1 型糖尿病严重低血糖的主要危险因素。尽管有研究表明,生物化学性低血糖在 IAH 中更为常见,但尚未对此进行准确评估。本研究旨在使用连续血糖监测(CGM)量化 IAH 中的低血糖,并评估其在识别低血糖意识受损中的作用。

方法

采用评估低血糖意识的既定方法,将 95 例 1 型糖尿病患者分为正常组(n=74)和意识受损组(n=21)。使用每周 4 点毛细血管家庭血糖监测(HBGM)、5 天 CGM 和严重低血糖前瞻性报告,前瞻性评估 9-12 个月的低血糖暴露情况。比较正常和低血糖意识受损患者的生物化学性和严重低血糖发作频率。

结果

与正常低血糖意识患者相比,低血糖意识受损患者发生严重低血糖的发生率高 3 倍[发病率比(IRR)3.37(95%可信区间 1.30-8.7);P=0.01],每周 HBGM 时低血糖发生率高 1.6 倍[IRR 1.63(95%可信区间 1.09-2.44);P=0.02]。CGM 未观察到显著差异[传感器血糖<或=3.0mmol/l 的 IRR 1.47(95%可信区间 0.91-2.39);P=0.12;传感器血糖<或=2.2mmol/l 的 IRR 1.23(95%可信区间 0.76-1.98);P=0.40]。

结论

与正常低血糖意识患者相比,1 型糖尿病低血糖意识受损患者发生严重低血糖的风险高 3 倍,每周监测时生物化学性低血糖的发生率高 1.6 倍,但 5 天 CGM 并不能区分意识受损和正常患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验