Zammitt Nicola N, Forbes Shareen, Inkster Berit, Strachan Mark W J, Wright Rohana J, Dover Anna R, Stimson Roland H, Gibb Fraser W
Edinburgh Centre for Endocrinology & Diabetes, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
University/BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Diabet Med. 2025 Oct;42(10):e70074. doi: 10.1111/dme.70074. Epub 2025 May 19.
This study aimed to assess the prevalence of impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) and severe hypoglycaemia (SH) in adults with type 1 diabetes and identify risk factors for both conditions in a contemporary cohort.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 782 adults with type 1 diabetes. Participants completed a questionnaire including validated hypoglycaemia awareness and mental health tools. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were collected in 402 participants. SH was identified based on self-reported episodes.
89% were CGM users and 27% were using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). 5.3% of participants reported a recent episode of SH and 21% had IAH based on the Gold score. Elevated Gold Score was independently associated with socioeconomic deprivation (OR 1.9, p = 0.002), female sex (OR 1.8, p = 0.002) and positive depression screen (OR 2.1, p = 0.007). Hypoglycaemia detection threshold <3.0 mM was independently associated with older age (OR 1.03 per year, p < 0.001) and positive depression screen (OR 2.7, p < 0.001). Greater glucose variability (OR 1.14 per % CV glucose, p < 0.001), positive anxiety screen (OR 3.0, p = 0.031) and detection threshold <3.0 mM (OR 6.7, p < 0.001) were all independently associated with SH risk.
The prevalence of SH is lower in the modern era of type 1 diabetes management and may reflect greater use of CGM and CSII. Mental health symptoms and socioeconomic deprivation are key associations with IAH and SH. Risk models incorporating clinical, psychological and CGM data may more effectively predict SH.
本研究旨在评估1型糖尿病成年患者低血糖意识受损(IAH)和严重低血糖(SH)的患病率,并确定当代队列中这两种情况的危险因素。
对782名1型糖尿病成年患者进行了横断面调查。参与者完成了一份问卷,其中包括经过验证的低血糖意识和心理健康工具。402名参与者收集了连续血糖监测(CGM)数据。根据自我报告的发作情况确定严重低血糖。
89%的参与者使用CGM,27%的参与者使用持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)。5.3%的参与者报告近期有严重低血糖发作,根据Gold评分,21%的参与者存在IAH。Gold评分升高与社会经济剥夺(比值比1.9,p = 0.002)、女性(比值比1.8,p = 0.002)和抑郁筛查阳性(比值比2.1,p = 0.007)独立相关。低血糖检测阈值<3.0 mM与年龄较大(每年比值比1.03,p < 0.001)和抑郁筛查阳性(比值比2.7,p < 0.001)独立相关。更大的血糖变异性(每% CV血糖比值比1.14,p < 0.001)、焦虑筛查阳性(比值比3.0,p = 0.031)和检测阈值<3.0 mM(比值比6.7,p < 0.001)均与严重低血糖风险独立相关。
在1型糖尿病管理的现代时代,严重低血糖的患病率较低,这可能反映了CGM和CSII的更多使用。心理健康症状和社会经济剥夺是与IAH和严重低血糖的关键关联因素。纳入临床、心理和CGM数据的风险模型可能更有效地预测严重低血糖。