Gothenburg Botanical Garden, Carl Skottsbergs gata 22A, 413 19 Göteborg, Sweden.
BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Jun 14;10:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-177.
The temporal origin and diversification of orchids (family Orchidaceae) has been subject to intense debate in the last decade. The description of the first reliable fossil in 2007 enabled a direct calibration of the orchid phylogeny, but little attention has been paid to the potential influence of dating methodology in obtaining reliable age estimates. Moreover, two new orchid fossils described in 2009 have not yet been incorporated in a molecular dating analysis. Here we compare the ages of major orchid clades estimated under two widely used methods, a Bayesian relaxed clock implemented in BEAST and Penalized Likelihood implemented in r8s. We then perform a new family-level analysis by integrating all 3 available fossils and using BEAST. To evaluate how the newly estimated ages may influence the evolutionary interpretation of a species-level phylogeny, we assess divergence times for the South American genus Hoffmannseggella (subfam. Epidendroideae), for which we present an almost complete phylogeny (40 out of 41 species sampled).
Our results provide additional support that all extant orchids shared a most recent common ancestor in the Late Cretaceous (approximately 77 million years ago, Ma). However, we estimate the crown age of the five orchid subfamilies to be generally (approximately1-8 Ma) younger than previously calculated under the Penalized Likelihood algorithm and using a single internal fossil calibration. The crown age of Hoffmannseggella is estimated here at approximately 11 Ma, some 3 Ma more recently than estimated under Penalized Likelihood.
Contrary to recent suggestions that orchid diversification began in a period of global warming, our results place the onset of diversification of the largest orchid subfamilies (Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae) in a period of global cooling subsequent to the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum. The diversification of Hoffmannseggella appears even more correlated to late Tertiary climatic fluctuations than previously suggested. With the incorporation of new fossils in the orchid phylogeny and the use of a method that is arguably more adequate given the present data, our results represent the most up-to-date estimate of divergence times in orchids.
在过去的十年中,orchids(兰科)的时间起源和多样化一直是激烈争论的话题。2007 年首次描述的第一个可靠化石使 orchid 系统发育得到了直接校准,但很少有人关注约会方法在获得可靠年龄估计方面的潜在影响。此外,2009 年描述的两个新的 orchid 化石尚未纳入分子定年分析。在这里,我们比较了两种广泛使用的方法估计的主要 orchid 进化枝的年龄,一种是 BEAST 中实现的贝叶斯松弛时钟,另一种是 r8s 中实现的惩罚似然。然后,我们通过整合所有 3 个可用化石并使用 BEAST 进行新的家族级分析。为了评估新估计的年龄如何影响物种水平系统发育的进化解释,我们评估了南美属 Hoffmannseggella(subfam. Epidendroideae)的分化时间,我们为此提供了几乎完整的系统发育(采样的 41 个物种中的 40 个)。
我们的结果进一步支持所有现存的 orchids 在晚白垩世(约 7700 万年前)有一个最近的共同祖先。然而,我们估计五个 orchid 亚科的冠年龄通常比以前使用 Penalized Likelihood 算法和使用单个内部化石校准计算的要年轻(约 1-8 Ma)。Hoffmannseggella 的冠年龄估计为大约 11 Ma,比 Penalized Likelihood 估计的要晚约 3 Ma。
与最近的一些建议相反,兰花的多样化始于全球变暖时期,我们的结果表明,最大的兰花亚科(Orchidoideae 和 Epidendroideae)的多样化发生在始新世气候最佳期之后的全球冷却时期。Hoffmannseggella 的多样化似乎与晚第三纪气候波动的相关性甚至比以前建议的更大。随着新化石在兰花系统发育中的纳入以及使用一种被认为更适合现有数据的方法,我们的结果代表了兰花分化时间的最新估计。