• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种多股舌侧保持器丝黏接于切牙釉质的黏接力和变形:一项体外研究。

Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics Dental Institute of King's College London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2010 Dec;32(6):741-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq017. Epub 2010 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjq017
PMID:20547494
Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine, in vitro, the effect of a vertical force on the debond force and deformation of two multi-stranded wires bonded to the lingual enamel of lower incisor teeth. Two different stainless steel wires were used, 0.016 × 0.022 inch (Bond-A-Braid® Reliance Orthodontic Products) and a three-stranded 0.0175 inch wire (Ortho Technology). An in vitro model was used to simulate a vertical force at the interdental wire. Twenty-six pairs of incisors were placed in two groups. A 15 mm length of wire was bonded to the lingual surfaces of each pair of incisors using a common bonding technique. A vertical force was applied to the midpoint of the interdental wire, using an Instron universal testing machine. The failure characteristics examined included the maximum force for debond, the degree of wire deformation, and the site of failure. Significance was predetermined at P < 0.05 and multiple comparisons indicated no significant differences (P = 0.147) in the initial mean bond strength between the 0.0175 inch (41.44 N) and 0.016 × 0.022 inch (37.70 N) wires. The main failure type for both the initial and second debond events was fracture of composite bond at the wire-composite interface, cohesive failure. Both wires exhibited similar mean degrees of deflection of 1.30 and 1.51 mm for the 0.0175 inch and 0.016 × 0.022 inch wires, respectively. Rebonding to enamel resulted in significantly lower (P = 0.001) mean bond strength for both wires, 0.0175 inch (13.86 N) and 0.016 × 0.022 inch (14.17 N) in comparison with the initial bond strength. Rebonding to previously bonded enamel may be unpredictable and may lead to higher failure rates of bonded lingual retainers.

摘要

本研究旨在体外检测垂直力对两根多股结扎丝在离体下颌切牙舌侧釉质粘结的粘结力和变形的影响。使用了两种不同的不锈钢丝,0.016×0.022 英寸(Bond-A-Braid® Reliance Orthodontic Products)和 0.0175 英寸三股丝(Ortho Technology)。体外模型模拟了牙间结扎丝的垂直力。将 26 对切牙分为两组。用常规粘结技术将 15mm 长的结扎丝粘结到每对切牙的舌面。用 Instron 万能试验机在牙间结扎丝中点施加垂直力。检查的失效特征包括最大粘结力、丝变形程度和失效部位。显著性预先设定为 P<0.05,多重比较表明 0.0175 英寸(41.44N)和 0.016×0.022 英寸(37.70N)丝的初始平均粘结强度之间无显著差异(P=0.147)。两种丝的初始和二次脱粘的主要失效类型均为丝-复合粘结剂界面的复合粘结剂断裂,即内聚性失效。0.0175 英寸和 0.016×0.022 英寸丝的平均挠度分别为 1.30mm 和 1.51mm。与初始粘结强度相比,重新粘结到釉质时两种丝的粘结强度均显著降低(P=0.001),0.0175 英寸(13.86N)和 0.016×0.022 英寸(14.17N)。重新粘结到之前粘结的釉质可能是不可预测的,并且可能导致粘结舌侧保持器的失败率增加。

相似文献

1
Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study.两种多股舌侧保持器丝黏接于切牙釉质的黏接力和变形:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Dec;32(6):741-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq017. Epub 2010 Jun 13.
2
Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer-a study of the initial bond strength.粘结舌侧丝保持器的稳定性——初始粘结强度研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2004 Jul;65(4):321-35. doi: 10.1007/s00056-004-0401-4.
3
Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite.复合丝与弹性螺旋丝保持器复合釉质界面之间的微渗漏。第 2 部分:含非晶磷酸钙的黏结剂与传统舌侧保持器复合材料的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Dec;31(6):652-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp039. Epub 2009 Oct 25.
4
Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers.V形圈与直丝舌侧保持器的粘结失败率。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):502-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.037.
5
Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers.用于粘结正畸保持器的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):254-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp066. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
6
Gingival health and relapse tendency: a prospective study of two types of lower fixed retainers.牙龈健康与复发倾向:两种类型下颌固定保持器的前瞻性研究
Aust Orthod J. 2009 Nov;25(2):142-6.
7
Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.黏接式正畸保持器与牙釉质的黏附性能:不锈钢丝与纤维增强复合材料的比较。
J Adhes Dent. 2009 Oct;11(5):381-90.
8
Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 1: comparison of three composites.复合丝与弹性螺旋丝保持器复合釉质界面之间的微渗漏。第 1 部分:三种复合材料的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Dec;31(6):647-51. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp038. Epub 2009 Oct 25.
9
Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment.通过钢丝表面处理提高粘结式保持器的钢丝-复合材料粘结强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jun;119(6):625-31. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.113789.
10
Rebond strength of bonded lingual wire retainers.黏接舌侧弓丝保持器的再粘接强度。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Jun;34(3):345-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr017. Epub 2011 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of bonding protocols and physical-mechanical properties of composite on durability and failure rate of fixed orthodontic retainers: a systematic review of laboratory studies.粘结方案及复合材料的物理机械性能对固定正畸保持器耐久性和失败率的影响:实验室研究的系统评价
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1255. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06635-6.
2
Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Types of Retainer Wires Bonded with a Composite Adhesive: An Study.三种类型的固定丝与复合粘合剂粘结的剪切粘结强度评估:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1338-S1340. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_51_25. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3
Debonding forces and failure modes of customized three-dimensional printed nano-ceramic hybrid resin fixed lingual retainers.
定制三维打印纳米陶瓷复合树脂固定舌侧保持器的脱粘力及失效模式
J Orthod Sci. 2025 Mar 25;14:2. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_75_24. eCollection 2025.
4
A Novel 3-Dimensional Printed Nanoceramic Hybrid Resin Fixed Lingual Retainer: Characterization and Mechanical Tests.一种新型三维打印纳米陶瓷复合树脂固定舌侧保持器:表征与力学测试。
Int J Dent. 2024 Oct 15;2024:3540846. doi: 10.1155/2024/3540846. eCollection 2024.
5
In Vitro Investigation Using a New Biomechanical Force-Torque Analysis System: Comparison of Conventional and CAD/CAM-Fixed Orthodontic Retainers.使用新型生物力学力-扭矩分析系统的体外研究:传统正畸保持器与CAD/CAM固定正畸保持器的比较
Materials (Basel). 2024 Oct 8;17(19):4916. doi: 10.3390/ma17194916.
6
Mechanical properties of combined packable and high-filled flowable composite used for the fixed retainer: an in vitro study.用于固定保持器的组合可压实和高填充流动性复合树脂的机械性能:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 10;24(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04437-w.
7
A comparative study of CAD/CAM fabricated polyether ether ketone and fiber-glass reinforcement composites versus metal lingual retainers under vertical load (an in vitro study).CAD/CAM 制作的聚醚醚酮和玻璃纤维增强复合材料与金属舌侧保持器在垂直载荷下的对比研究(一项体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 21;23(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03268-5.
8
Comparison of six different CAD/CAM retainers vs. the stainless steel twistflex retainer: an in vitro investigation of survival rate and stability.六种不同的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)固位体与不锈钢丝圈式固位体的比较:一项关于生存率和稳定性的体外研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Mar;86(2):119-128. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00486-y. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
9
Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial.CAD/CAM 与传统多股结扎丝固定保持器在正畸患者中的稳定性、存活率和患者满意度:一项为期 6 个月的双中心随机对照临床试验的随访。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 Feb 10;45(1):58-67. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac042.
10
Preparation of Nano-Apatite Grafted Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Orthodontic Application: Mechanical and In Vitro Biofilm Analysis.用于正畸应用的纳米磷灰石接枝玻璃纤维增强复合材料的制备:力学性能和体外生物膜分析
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 13;15(10):3504. doi: 10.3390/ma15103504.