Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Hum Genet. 2010 Sep;128(3):249-60. doi: 10.1007/s00439-010-0845-0. Epub 2010 Jun 13.
Little is known about the lay public's awareness and attitudes concerning genetic testing and what factors influence their perspectives. The existing literature focuses mainly on ethnic and socioeconomic differences; however, here we focus on how awareness and attitudes regarding genetic testing differ by geographical regions in the US. We compared awareness and attitudes concerning genetic testing for disease risk and ancestry among 452 adults (41% Black and 67% female) in four major US cities, Norman, OK; Cincinnati, OH; Harlem, NY; and Washington, DC; prior to their participation in genetic ancestry testing. The OK participants reported more detail about their personal ancestries (p = 0.02) and valued ancestry testing over disease testing more than all other sites (p < 0.01). The NY participants were more likely than other sites to seek genetic testing for disease (p = 0.01) and to see benefit in finding out more about one's ancestry (p = 0.02), while the DC participants reported reading and hearing more about genetic testing for African ancestry than all other sites (p < 0.01). These site differences were not better accounted for by sex, age, education, self-reported ethnicity, religion, or previous experience with genetic testing/counseling. Regional differences in awareness and attitudes transcend traditional demographic predictors, such as ethnicity, age and education. Local sociocultural factors, more than ethnicity and socioeconomic status, may influence the public's awareness and belief systems, particularly with respect to genetics.
公众对基因检测的认识和态度知之甚少,也不清楚哪些因素会影响他们的观点。现有文献主要关注种族和社会经济差异;然而,在这里,我们关注的是美国不同地区的公众对基因检测的认识和态度有何不同。我们比较了美国四个主要城市(俄克拉荷马州诺曼市、俄亥俄州辛辛那提市、纽约哈莱姆区和华盛顿特区)的 452 名成年人(41%为黑人,67%为女性)在参与基因祖先检测之前,对疾病风险和祖先的基因检测的意识和态度。俄克拉荷马州的参与者报告了更多关于他们个人祖先的详细信息(p = 0.02),并且比其他所有地区更重视祖先检测而不是疾病检测(p < 0.01)。与其他地区相比,纽约的参与者更有可能寻求疾病基因检测(p = 0.01),并认为了解更多关于自己祖先的情况有益(p = 0.02),而华盛顿特区的参与者报告称,他们比其他地区更多地听说过和阅读过有关非洲裔祖先的基因检测(p < 0.01)。这些地点差异不能用性别、年龄、教育、自我报告的种族、宗教或以前的基因检测/咨询经验来更好地解释。意识和态度的地区差异超越了种族、年龄和教育等传统人口统计学预测因素。地方社会文化因素,而不是种族和社会经济地位,可能会影响公众的意识和信仰体系,尤其是在遗传学方面。