• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖患者慢性病照护评估量表(PACIC - 5A)的心理测量学特性

Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care measure (PACIC-5A) among patients with obesity.

作者信息

Schwenke Maria, Welzel Franziska D, Luck-Sikorski Claudia, Pabst Alexander, Kersting Anette, Blüher Matthias, König Hans-Helmut, Riedel-Heller Steffi G, Stein Janine

机构信息

Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Integrated Research and Treatment Centre (IFB) AdiposityDiseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 23;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3871-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-3871-1
PMID:30674311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6343299/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5A) was developed to assess the satisfaction with patient-provider interaction based on the Chronic Care Model. The additional 5A approach (assess, advise, agree, assist, arrange) allows to score behavioral counseling. The aim of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the German adaptation of the PACIC-5A questionnaire in a sample of general practitioners (GP) patients with obesity.

METHODS

Analyses were based on data from the study "Five A's counseling in weight management of obese patients in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial (INTERACT)". Data were collected via standardized questionnaires containing the 26-item version of the PACIC-5A questionnaire. A total of 117 patients with obesity were included in the analyses. Statistical procedures comprised descriptive analyses, the calculation of Cronbach's alpha, test-retest analyses and factor analyses in order to assess the psychometric properties including reliability and validity of the PACIC-5A.

RESULTS

The patient's mean age was 43.4 years and the sample was mostly female (59%). Middle educational level was found for the majority (78%) and the mean Body Mass Index was 38.9 kg/m. Descriptive analyses revealed a mean PACIC score of 2.33 and 5A sum score of 2.29. Notable floor effects were found. PACIC-5A showed high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas > 0.9) and exploratory factor analyses resulted in a unidimensional structure.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study provide evidence regarding the psychometric properties of the German version of the PACIC-5A used in a sample of GP patients with obesity and make an important contribution to the reliable and valid assessment of the patient-GP interaction with regard to obesity counseling in primary care.

摘要

背景

慢性病照护患者评估量表(PACIC - 5A)旨在基于慢性病照护模型评估患者对医患互动的满意度。额外的5A方法(评估、建议、商定、协助、安排)可用于对行为咨询进行评分。本研究的目的是在全科医生(GP)的肥胖患者样本中评估PACIC - 5A问卷德文版的心理测量特性。

方法

分析基于“基层医疗中肥胖患者体重管理的5A咨询:一项整群随机对照试验(INTERACT)”的研究数据。通过包含26项版本的PACIC - 5A问卷的标准化问卷收集数据。分析共纳入117例肥胖患者。统计程序包括描述性分析、Cronbach's α系数计算、重测分析和因子分析,以评估PACIC - 5A的心理测量特性,包括信度和效度。

结果

患者的平均年龄为43.4岁,样本大多为女性(59%)。大多数患者(78%)为中等教育水平,平均体重指数为38.9kg/m。描述性分析显示PACIC平均得分为2.33,5A总分平均为2.29。发现有明显的地板效应。PACIC - 5A显示出高度的内部一致性(Cronbach's α系数>0.9),探索性因子分析得出单维结构。

结论

本研究结果为PACIC - 5A德文版在全科医生肥胖患者样本中的心理测量特性提供了证据,并对在基层医疗中就肥胖咨询对医患互动进行可靠有效的评估做出了重要贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade1/6343299/2fe2b564942c/12913_2019_3871_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade1/6343299/cafddbce73c1/12913_2019_3871_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade1/6343299/74c500fef27f/12913_2019_3871_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade1/6343299/2fe2b564942c/12913_2019_3871_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade1/6343299/cafddbce73c1/12913_2019_3871_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade1/6343299/74c500fef27f/12913_2019_3871_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade1/6343299/2fe2b564942c/12913_2019_3871_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care measure (PACIC-5A) among patients with obesity.肥胖患者慢性病照护评估量表(PACIC - 5A)的心理测量学特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 23;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3871-1.
2
Factorial validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands.在荷兰心血管疾病患者中对慢性病患者评估慢性病照护(PACIC)及其简短版(PACIC-S)进行析因验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Aug 31;10:104. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-104.
3
Validity and reliability of the patient assessment on chronic illness care (PACIC) questionnaire: the Malay version.慢性病照护患者评估问卷(PACIC)的效度与信度:马来语版本
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0807-5.
4
Translation and validation of the PACIC+ questionnaire: the Thai version.PACIC+问卷的翻译与验证:泰语版本
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0801-y.
5
Reliability and validity of the Greek translation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care + (PACIC-PLUS GR) survey.希腊语翻译的患者评估慢性病护理+(PACIC-PLUS-GR)调查的可靠性和有效性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 25;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01192-z.
6
Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment Of Chronic Illness Care measure: acceptability, reliability and validity in United Kingdom patients with long-term conditions.患者评估慢性疾病护理量表的心理测量特性:英国长期疾病患者的可接受性、信度和效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 31;12:293. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-293.
7
Evaluation of a culturally adapted German version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC 5A) questionnaire in a sample of osteoarthritis patients.在骨关节炎患者样本中对经文化调适的德语版慢性病患者护理评估问卷(PACIC 5A)进行评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;13(5):806-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00786.x.
8
Transcultural adaptation and validation of Persian Version of Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5As) Questionnaire in Iranian older patients with type 2 diabetes.跨文化调适与验证伊朗 2 型糖尿病老年患者使用慢性疾病关怀患者评估问卷(PACIC-5As)波斯语版
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11557-0.
9
Patients' assessment of chronic illness care: a validation study among patients with type 2 diabetes in Finland.患者对慢性病护理的评估:芬兰2型糖尿病患者的一项验证性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3206-7.
10
Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) in Type 2 Diabetes: A Longitudinal Study.2型糖尿病患者慢性病照护评估(PACIC):一项纵向研究
Eval Health Prof. 2016 Jun;39(2):185-203. doi: 10.1177/0163278714556674. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported quality of outpatient healthcare in patients with chronic back or arthrosis pain with long-term opioid therapy in Germany.德国长期接受阿片类药物治疗的慢性背痛或关节炎疼痛患者报告的门诊医疗质量。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jun 21;26(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02881-3.
2
Transcultural adaptation and validation of Persian Version of Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5As) Questionnaire in Iranian older patients with type 2 diabetes.跨文化调适与验证伊朗 2 型糖尿病老年患者使用慢性疾病关怀患者评估问卷(PACIC-5As)波斯语版
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11557-0.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Five A's counseling in weight management of obese patients in primary care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial (INTERACT).初级保健中肥胖患者体重管理的“5A”咨询:一项整群随机对照试验(INTERACT)
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 23;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0785-7.
2
The Integrated Care of Asthma in Switzerland (INCAS) Study: Changes in Asthma Control and Perception of Health Care through Asthma Education.瑞士哮喘综合管理(INCAS)研究:通过哮喘教育改善哮喘控制和对医疗保健的认知。
Respiration. 2017;94(5):416-423. doi: 10.1159/000478945. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
3
Diabetes care: Comparison of patients' and healthcare professionals' assessment using the PACIC instrument.
Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Its Influence on Patient Compliance With Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study.
患者评估慢性疾病护理 (PACIC) 及其对高血压患者依从性的影响:一项横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241277445. doi: 10.1177/00469580241277445.
4
Traditional and complementary medicine (TCM) usage and its association with Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) among individuals with metabolic syndrome in primary care.传统医学和补充医学(TCM)的使用及其与初级保健中代谢综合征患者的慢性病患者评估(PACIC)之间的关联。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022 Jan 13;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03493-x.
5
Development of a women's empowerment index for Tanzania from the demographic and health surveys of 2004-05, 2010, and 2015-16.根据2004 - 05年、2010年以及2015 - 16年的人口与健康调查制定坦桑尼亚妇女赋权指数。
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 7;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12982-021-00103-6.
6
Attitudes and treatment practice of general practitioners towards patients with obesity in primary care.全科医生对初级保健中肥胖患者的态度和治疗实践。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Aug 17;21(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01239-1.
糖尿病护理:使用患者激活护理指数(PACIC)工具对患者与医疗保健专业人员评估的比较
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):803-811. doi: 10.1111/jep.12720. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
4
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
5
Patient Experience in an Era of Primary Care Transformation: Revisiting the PACIC.基层医疗转型时代的患者体验:重新审视患者对医疗服务体验的评估量表(PACIC)
Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2016;4(3):528-540.
6
The integrated care of asthma in Switzerland (INCAS)-study: Patients' perspective of received asthma care and their interest in asthma education.瑞士哮喘综合护理(INCAS)研究:患者对所接受哮喘护理的看法及其对哮喘教育的兴趣。
J Asthma. 2016 Nov;53(9):955-63. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2016.1170140. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
7
Influence of patient-assessed quality of chronic illness care and patient activation on health-related quality of life.患者评估的慢性病护理质量和患者自我管理能力对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):306-10. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw023. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
8
Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) in Type 2 Diabetes: A Longitudinal Study.2型糖尿病患者慢性病照护评估(PACIC):一项纵向研究
Eval Health Prof. 2016 Jun;39(2):185-203. doi: 10.1177/0163278714556674. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Evaluating the structure of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey from the patient's perspective.从患者角度评估慢性病护理患者评估量表(PACIC)的结构。
Ann Behav Med. 2015 Feb;49(1):104-11. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9638-3.
10
Adaptation and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care in the French context.慢性病护理患者评估在法国背景下的适应性与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 19;14:269. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-269.