微创腰椎间盘手术是否比传统手术造成的肌肉损伤更小?一项随机对照试验。

Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2011 Jan;20(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1482-y. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

Abstract

The concept of minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery comprises reduced muscle injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate creatine phosphokinase (CPK) in serum and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the multifidus muscle on magnetic resonance imaging as indicators of muscle injury. We present the results of a double-blind randomized trial on patients with lumbar disc herniation, in which tubular discectomy and conventional microdiscectomy were compared. In 216 patients, CPK was measured before surgery and at day 1 after surgery. In 140 patients, the CSA of the multifidus muscle was measured at the affected disc level before surgery and at 1 year after surgery. The ratios (i.e. post surgery/pre surgery) of CPK and CSA were used as outcome measures. The multifidus atrophy was classified into three grades ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe atrophy), and the difference between post and pre surgery was used as an outcome. Patients' low-back pain scores on the visual analogue scale (VAS) were documented before surgery and at various moments during follow-up. Tubular discectomy compared with conventional microdiscectomy resulted in a nonsignificant difference in CPK ratio, although the CSA ratio was significantly lower in tubular discectomy. At 1 year, there was no difference in atrophy grade between both groups nor in the percentage of patients showing an increased atrophy grade (14% tubular vs. 18% conventional). The postoperative low-back pain scores on the VAS improved in both groups, although the 1-year between-group mean difference of improvement was 3.5 mm (95% CI; 1.4-5.7 mm) in favour of conventional microdiscectomy. In conclusion, tubular discectomy compared with conventional microdiscectomy did not result in reduced muscle injury. Postoperative evaluation of CPK and the multifidus muscle showed similar results in both groups, although patients who underwent tubular discectomy reported more low-back pain during the first year after surgery.

摘要

微创腰椎间盘手术的概念包括减少肌肉损伤。本研究的目的是评估血清肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)和磁共振成像(MRI)上多裂肌的横截面积(CSA)作为肌肉损伤的指标。我们报告了一项关于腰椎间盘突出症患者的双盲随机试验结果,其中比较了管状椎间盘切除术和传统的微创手术。在 216 名患者中,测量了手术前和手术后第 1 天的 CPK。在 140 名患者中,在术前和术后 1 年测量了受影响的椎间盘水平的多裂肌 CSA。CPK 和 CSA 的比值(即术后/术前)用作结果测量。多裂肌萎缩分为 0(正常)至 3(严重萎缩)三个等级,术后与术前的差异用作结果。在手术前和随访过程中的各个时刻记录了患者的腰痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。管状椎间盘切除术与传统微创手术相比,CPK 比值无显著差异,尽管管状椎间盘切除术的 CSA 比值显著降低。在 1 年时,两组之间的萎缩程度分级没有差异,也没有显示出增加的萎缩程度分级的患者比例(管状 14% vs. 常规 18%)。两组患者术后腰痛 VAS 评分均有所改善,尽管常规微创手术组的平均改善程度在组间差异为 3.5 毫米(95%置信区间;1.4-5.7 毫米)。总之,与传统微创手术相比,管状椎间盘切除术并未导致肌肉损伤减少。CPK 和多裂肌的术后评估在两组中结果相似,尽管接受管状椎间盘切除术的患者在手术后的第一年报告了更多的腰痛。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9428/3036021/8374a4abd721/586_2010_1482_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索