• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查与常规筛查条件下的常规结肠镜检查比较。

Colon Capsule Endoscopy compared to Conventional Colonoscopy under routine screening conditions.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun 18;10:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-66.

DOI:10.1186/1471-230X-10-66
PMID:20565828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2905323/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy (CSPY) for colorectal cancer screening has several limitations. Colon Capsule Endoscopy (PillCam Colon, CCE) was compared to CSPY under routine screening conditions.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, single-center pilot study at a University Hospital. Data were obtained from November 2007 until May 2008. Patients underwent CCE on Day 1 and CSPY on Day 2. Outcomes were evaluated regarding sensitivity and specificity of polyp detection rate, with a significance level set at >5 mm.

RESULTS

59 individuals were included in this study, the results were evaluable in 56 patients (males 34, females 22; median age 59). CCE was complete in 36 subjects. Polyp detection rate for significant polyps was 11% on CSPY and 27% on CCE.6/56 (11%) patients had polyps on CSPY not detected on CCE (miss rate).Overall sensitivity was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61 to 90), specificity was 54% (95% CI, 35 to 70), positive predictive value (PPV) was 63% and negative predictive value (NPV) was 71%. Adjusted to significance of findings, sensitivity was 50% (95% CI, 19 to 81), specificity was 76% (95% CI, 63 to 86), PPV was 20% and NPV was 93%.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to the gold standard, the sensitivity of CCE for detection of relevant polyps is low, however, the high NPV supports its role as a possible screening tool.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00991003.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查(CSPY)用于结直肠癌筛查有几个局限性。在常规筛查条件下,胶囊内镜(PillCam Colon,CCE)与 CSPY 进行了比较。

方法

我们在一家大学医院进行了一项前瞻性、单中心的试点研究。数据于 2007 年 11 月至 2008 年 5 月获得。患者在第 1 天进行 CCE,在第 2 天进行 CSPY。评估了息肉检出率的灵敏度和特异性,以>5mm 为显著性水平。

结果

这项研究纳入了 59 名患者,其中 56 名患者的结果可评估(男性 34 名,女性 22 名;中位年龄 59 岁)。36 例患者 CCE 检查完成。CSPY 检测到的有意义息肉的息肉检出率为 11%,CCE 为 27%。6/56(11%)名患者在 CSPY 上发现的息肉在 CCE 上未被发现(漏诊率)。总体灵敏度为 79%(95%置信区间,61%至 90%),特异性为 54%(95%置信区间,35%至 70%),阳性预测值(PPV)为 63%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 71%。调整到发现的显著性,灵敏度为 50%(95%置信区间,19%至 81%),特异性为 76%(95%置信区间,63%至 86%),PPV 为 20%,NPV 为 93%。

结论

与金标准相比,CCE 检测相关息肉的灵敏度较低,但高 NPV 支持其作为一种可能的筛查工具的作用。

试验注册

NCT00991003。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8777/2905323/859dd911c828/1471-230X-10-66-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8777/2905323/c65be638f5d9/1471-230X-10-66-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8777/2905323/859dd911c828/1471-230X-10-66-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8777/2905323/c65be638f5d9/1471-230X-10-66-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8777/2905323/859dd911c828/1471-230X-10-66-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Colon Capsule Endoscopy compared to Conventional Colonoscopy under routine screening conditions.结肠镜检查与常规筛查条件下的常规结肠镜检查比较。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun 18;10:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-66.
2
Could the colonic capsule PillCam Colon be clinically useful for selecting patients who deserve a complete colonoscopy?: results of clinical comparison with colonoscopy in the perspective of colorectal cancer screening.结肠胶囊式内窥镜 PillCam Colon 对临床选择需要全结肠镜检查的患者是否有用?以结直肠癌筛查为视角的临床对比研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;105(5):1076-86. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.624. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
3
PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study.结肠 PillCam 胶囊内镜与结肠镜用于结直肠肿瘤诊断的比较:一项前瞻性初步研究。
Endoscopy. 2006 Oct;38(10):971-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944835.
4
Back-to-back colon capsule endoscopy and optical colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening individuals.在结直肠癌筛查人群中,进行连续结肠胶囊内镜检查和光学结肠镜检查。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jun;20(6):479-485. doi: 10.1111/codi.13965.
5
Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy.第二代结肠胶囊内镜与结肠镜检查的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):581-589.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1125. Epub 2011 May 20.
6
Accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy for advanced neoplasia.结肠胶囊内镜检查对高级别肿瘤的准确性。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Feb;91(2):406-414.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.09.041. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
7
Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy. Application of artificial intelligence algorithms to identify complete colonic investigations.结肠镜检查不完全后的结肠胶囊内镜与 CT 结肠成像术。人工智能算法在识别完整结肠检查中的应用。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Aug;8(7):782-789. doi: 10.1177/2050640620937593.
8
Colon capsule endoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in those with family histories of colorectal cancer.结肠镜检查用于筛查有结直肠癌家族史的人群中的结直肠肿瘤。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):695-704. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 26.
9
Colon capsule endoscopy: detection of colonic polyps compared with conventional colonoscopy and visualization of extracolonic pathologies.结肠胶囊内镜:与传统结肠镜检查相比对结肠息肉的检测及对结肠外病变的可视化观察。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;28(2):77-82. doi: 10.1155/2014/691785.
10
Clinical Factors Associated with Missing Colorectal Polyp on Colon Capsule Endoscopy.与结肠胶囊内镜检查中结直肠息肉漏诊相关的临床因素。
Digestion. 2020;101(3):316-322. doi: 10.1159/000498942. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Colon Capsule Endoscopy as a Promising Diagnostic Tool in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.结肠胶囊内镜检查作为结直肠癌一种有前景的诊断工具:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 26;15(17):2157. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172157.
2
What Is the Optimal Bowel Preparation for Capsule Colonoscopy and Pan-intestinal Capsule Endoscopy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胶囊结肠镜和全肠道胶囊内镜检查的最佳肠道准备是什么?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Dec;68(12):4418-4431. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08133-7. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Colon Capsule Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Colon Polyps: Who Needs a Colonoscopy?

本文引用的文献

1
Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer.胶囊内镜与结肠镜检查在息肉和癌症检测中的应用比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):264-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806347.
2
Is PillCam COLON capsule endoscopy ready for colorectal cancer screening? A prospective feasibility study in a community gastroenterology practice.结肠 PillCam 胶囊内镜检查是否适用于结直肠癌筛查?一项社区胃肠病学实践中的前瞻性可行性研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr;104(4):848-54. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.163. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
3
American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].
结肠胶囊内镜在结肠息肉诊断中的应用:谁需要进行结肠镜检查?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 29;12(9):2093. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092093.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Preferences for Colon Capsule Endoscopy and Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.患者报告的结肠胶囊内镜检查和结肠镜检查的结果与偏好:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 20;11(9):1730. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091730.
5
Recent Advance in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: What's New?结肠胶囊内镜的最新进展:有哪些新内容?
Clin Endosc. 2018 Jul;51(4):334-343. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.121. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
6
Multicenter, randomized study to optimize bowel preparation for colon capsule endoscopy.多中心、随机化研究以优化结肠胶囊内镜的肠道准备。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 28;23(48):8615-8625. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8615.
7
Feasibility of a novel low-volume and sodium phosphate-free bowel preparation regimen for colon capsule endoscopy.一种用于结肠胶囊内镜检查的新型低容量无磷酸钠肠道准备方案的可行性
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Aug;14(2):1739-1743. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4664. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
8
Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Detecting Colorectal Polyps in Individuals with Familial Colorectal Cancer: Could We Avoid Colonoscopies?结肠胶囊内镜在检测家族性结直肠癌患者结直肠息肉中的准确性:我们能否避免结肠镜检查?
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:1507914. doi: 10.1155/2017/1507914. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
9
Advances in Capsule Endoscopy.胶囊内镜的进展
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2015 Sep;11(9):612-7.
10
Colon capsule endoscopy: current status and future directions.结肠胶囊内镜检查:现状与未来方向。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 28;20(44):16596-602. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16596.
美国胃肠病学会2009年结直肠癌筛查指南[修订版]
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.104. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
4
New insight into intestinal motor function via noninvasive endoluminal image analysis.通过非侵入性腔内图像分析对肠道运动功能的新见解。
Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1155-62. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.084. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
5
Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.《2008年结直肠癌和腺瘤性息肉早期检测的筛查与监测:美国癌症协会、美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组和美国放射学会联合指南》
Gastroenterology. 2008 May;134(5):1570-95. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
6
The new scopes--broadening the colonoscopy marketplace.新型内镜——拓展结肠镜检查市场。
Digestion. 2007;76(1):42-50. doi: 10.1159/000108393. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
7
Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy.比较CT结肠成像、气钡双重造影和结肠镜检查的荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2007 Mar;120(3):203-210.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.061.
8
Colorectal cancer screening among men and women in the United States.美国男性和女性的结直肠癌筛查
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Jan-Feb;16(1):57-65. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0131.
9
Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.结肠镜检查筛查期间的结肠镜退出时间及腺瘤检出情况
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2533-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055498.
10
PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study.结肠 PillCam 胶囊内镜与结肠镜用于结直肠肿瘤诊断的比较:一项前瞻性初步研究。
Endoscopy. 2006 Oct;38(10):971-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944835.