Suppr超能文献

结肠胶囊内镜:与传统结肠镜检查相比对结肠息肉的检测及对结肠外病变的可视化观察。

Colon capsule endoscopy: detection of colonic polyps compared with conventional colonoscopy and visualization of extracolonic pathologies.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;28(2):77-82. doi: 10.1155/2014/691785.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventional colonoscopy (CC) is the gold standard for diagnostic examination of the colon. However, the overall acceptance of this procedure is low due to patient fears of complications or embarrassment. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) represents a minimally invasive, patient-friendly procedure that offers complete visualization of the entire intestine.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the PillCam Colon 2 (Given Imaging Ltd, Israel) capsule with regard to feasibility, sensitivity and specificity for the detection of colonic pathologies and additional recorded extracolonic findings.

METHODS

CCE was performed before CC in patients indicated for CC for known or suspected colonic disease. The results of both techniques were compared with regard to polyp detection. Additionally, bowel preparation and extracolonic pathologies were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (mean age 51.1 years) were included in the analysis. Visualization of the colon was complete in 23 CCs and 17 CCEs. No adverse events or major technical failures occurred. CC detected 47 polyps and CCE detected 43 polyps of any size (per-finding sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 67.6%). The accuracy of CCE in detecting polyp carriers was 81.5% (per-patient analysis). On average, the colon was adequately cleansed in 90.1% of patients. CCE identified esophageal, gastric and small bowel pathologies in seven (24%), nine (38%) and 14 (58%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CCE proved to be technically feasible and safe. Acceptable sensitivity and moderate specificity levels in polyp detection were recorded. Bowel preparation was adequate in most patients. Because extracolonic pathologies were effectively visualized, new indications for the PillCam Colon 2 may be defined.

摘要

背景

传统结肠镜检查(CC)是诊断结肠疾病的金标准。然而,由于患者担心并发症或尴尬,对该程序的总体接受度较低。胶囊内镜检查(CCE)是一种微创、患者友好的检查方法,可全面观察整个肠道。

目的

评估 PillCam Colon 2(以色列 Given Imaging Ltd 公司)胶囊的可行性、检测结肠病变的敏感性和特异性以及记录的其他肠外发现。

方法

对因已知或疑似结肠疾病而需要 CC 的患者进行 CCE 检查,然后进行 CC。比较两种技术在检测息肉方面的结果。此外,还分析了肠道准备情况和肠外病变。

结果

24 例患者(平均年龄 51.1 岁)纳入分析。23 例 CC 和 17 例 CCE 可完全观察到结肠。未发生不良事件或重大技术失败。CC 发现 47 个息肉,CCE 发现 43 个任何大小的息肉(每个息肉的检测敏感性为 90.9%,特异性为 67.6%)。CCE 检测息肉携带者的准确率为 81.5%(患者个体分析)。平均而言,90.1%的患者肠道清洁充分。CCE 分别在 7(24%)、9(38%)和 14(58%)例患者中发现食管、胃和小肠病变。

结论

CCE 技术上可行且安全。在检测息肉方面,其记录到可接受的敏感性和中等特异性水平。大多数患者肠道准备充分。由于有效地观察到肠外病变,可能为 PillCam Colon 2 定义新的适应证。

相似文献

3
Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy.第二代结肠胶囊内镜与结肠镜检查的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):581-589.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1125. Epub 2011 May 20.
7
Applications of Colon Capsule Endoscopy.结肠胶囊内镜的应用
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018 Apr 12;20(5):22. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0628-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Ingestible Electronics for Diagnostics and Therapy.用于诊断和治疗的可摄入式电子设备。
Nat Rev Mater. 2019 Feb;4(2):83-98. doi: 10.1038/s41578-018-0070-3. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
10
Recent Advance in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: What's New?结肠胶囊内镜的最新进展:有哪些新内容?
Clin Endosc. 2018 Jul;51(4):334-343. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.121. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

6
Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy.第二代结肠胶囊内镜与结肠镜检查的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):581-589.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1125. Epub 2011 May 20.
8
Magnetically controllable gastrointestinal steering of video capsules.磁控式视频胶囊胃肠道转向。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Feb;58(2):231-4. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2087332. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
9
Extracolonic findings at CT colonography.CT结肠成像的结肠外表现。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Apr;20(2):305-22. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.013.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验