Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查用于筛查有结直肠癌家族史的人群中的结直肠肿瘤。

Colon capsule endoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in those with family histories of colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Department, General Hospital of Sanremo, Sanremo, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy.

Gastroenterology, Hôpital Archet 2, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):695-704. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) has been recognized as an alternative for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk people. Our aim was to prospectively assess the accuracy of CCE as a screening tool in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with CRC by using optical colonoscopy (OC) with segmental unblinding as the reference standard.

METHODS

Consecutive patients admitted with a CRC diagnosis (index cases) were prospectively evaluated and invited to contact their FDRs. Available FDRs were invited to undergo CCE and OC on the following day, with segmental unblinding of CCE results. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) of CCE were assessed for detecting patients with any polyp ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm.

RESULTS

A total of 177 FDRs (median age 57.0 years, 54.8% female) identified from 211 index cases were included. Both CCE and OC were completed in all the included FDRs. Overall, CCE identified 51 of 56 FDRs with polyps ≥6 mm (sensitivity 91%; 95% CI, 81-96) and correctly classified as negative 107 of 121 participants without lesions ≥6 mm (specificity 88%; 95% CI, 81-93). Per-patient positive and negative predictive values for ≥6 mm lesions were 78% (95% CI, 67-87) and 95% (95% CI, 90-98), respectively. CCE detected 24 of 27 patients with polyps ≥10 mm and correctly classified as negative 142 of 150 patients, corresponding to 89% sensitivity and 95% specificity. Post-CCE referral rates to colonoscopy were 37% and 18%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CCE is an accurate method to screen FDRs of patients with CRC and could be offered as an alternative to those who decline or are unfit for colonoscopy screening. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01184781.).

摘要

背景与目的

结肠胶囊内镜(CCE)已被认为是一种替代结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的方法,适用于一般风险人群。我们的目的是前瞻性评估 CCE 在 CRC 患者一级亲属(FDRs)中的筛查准确性,以光学结肠镜检查(OC)作为参考标准,采用分段盲法。

方法

连续纳入诊断为 CRC 的患者(索引病例),并前瞻性评估,邀请其联系 FDRs。对有条件的 FDRs 进行 CCE 和 OC 检查,第二天对 CCE 结果进行分段盲法。评估 CCE 检测任何≥6mm 和≥10mm 息肉患者的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值/阴性预测值(PPV/NPV)。

结果

共纳入 211 例索引病例中的 177 例 FDRs(中位年龄 57.0 岁,54.8%为女性)。所有纳入的 FDRs 均完成了 CCE 和 OC 检查。总体而言,CE 检出 56 例 FDRs 中有 51 例存在≥6mm 息肉(敏感性 91%;95%CI,81-96),121 例无≥6mm 病变的 FDRs中正确分类为阴性 107 例(特异性 88%;95%CI,81-93)。对于≥6mm 病变,CE 检测的阳性和阴性预测值分别为 78%(95%CI,67-87)和 95%(95%CI,90-98)。CE 检出 27 例≥10mm 息肉患者中的 24 例,正确分类为阴性 150 例,敏感性为 89%,特异性为 95%。CE 后转至结肠镜检查的转诊率分别为 37%和 18%。

结论

CE 是一种筛查 CRC 患者 FDRs 的准确方法,可作为拒绝或不适合结肠镜筛查的患者的替代方法。(临床试验注册号:NCT01184781)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验