Department of Plant Physiology (BioIII), RWTH Aachen, Worringerweg 1, D-52056 Aachen, Germany.
Mol Plant Pathol. 2003 May 1;4(3):159-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00166.x.
SUMMARY Downy mildew of Arabidopsis is not a hugely destructive disease of an important crop plant, neither is it of any economic importance. The most obvious symptom, the aerial conidiophores, might, at a glance to the casual observer, be mistaken for the trichomes normally present on the leaves. However, a huge research effort is being devoted to this humble pathosystem which became established as a laboratory model in the 1990s. Since then, enormous progress has been made in cloning and characterizing major genes for resistance (RPP genes) and in defining many of their downstream signalling components, some of them RPP-gene specific. Resistance is generally associated with an oxidative burst and a salicylic acid dependent hypersensitive reaction type of programmed cell death. Biological and chemical induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in Arabidopsis protecting against downy mildew were demonstrated early on, and investigations of mutants have contributed fundamentally to our understanding of host-pathogen interactions and the mechanisms of plant defence. This review will attempt to collate the wealth of information which has accrued with this pathosystem in the last decade and will attempt to predict future research directions by drawing attention to some still unanswered questions.
Hyaloperonospora Constant. parasitica (Pers.:Fr) Fr. (formerly Peronospora parasitica), Kingdom Chromista, Phylum Oomycota, Order Peronosporales, Family Peronosporaceae, Genus Hyaloperonospora, of which it is the type species. The taxonomy of the group of organisms causing downy mildew of brassicas has undergone a number of revisions since Corda (1837) originally coined the genus Peronospora. All isolates pathogenic on brassicas were described initially as P. parasitica but Gäumann (1918) classified isolates from different brassicaceous hosts distinctly and thus defined 52 new species based on conidial dimensions and host range. After much debate it was decided to revert to the aggregate species of P. parasitica for all brassica-infecting downy mildews, whilst recognizing that these show some isolate-specific differences (Yerkes and Shaw, 1959). The latest re-examination of P. parasitica by Constantinescu and Fatehi (2002) has placed isolates of P. parasitica and five other downy mildew species in a clear new subgroup on the basis of their hyaline conidiospores, recurved conidiophore branch tips and ITS1, ITS2 and 5.8S rDNA sequence comparisons; meriting the coining of the new genus 'Hyaloperonospora Constant'. The class Oomycetes in the Kingdom Chromista (Straminipila) comprises fungus-like organisms with heterokont zoospores (i.e. possessing two types of flagellae, whiplash and tinsel). The Oomycetes have non-septate hyphae with cellulose-based walls containing very little or no chitin. The latter is regarded as a major distinction separating the Oomycetes from the true fungi, and reports of the presence of chitin had generally been regarded as due to small amounts of contamination (Gams et al., 1998). However, in view of recent studies by Werner et al. (2002) showing a chitin synthase gene in an Oomycete and demonstrating the presence of the polymer itself by an interaction with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), it is perhaps safe to say that we have not seen the last taxonomic revision which will affect this group! The families within the Oomycetes show a clear evolutionary trend to a lesser absolute dependence on an aqueous environment and some members of the Peronosporales, e.g. H. parasitica, have no zoosporic stage in the life cycle.
Isolates infecting Arabidopsis thaliana have so far proven to be non-pathogenic on other crucifers tested but exist in a clear gene-for-gene relationship with different host ecotypes. Disease symptoms: Infections are first apparent to the naked eye as a carpet or 'down' of conidiophores covering the upper and lower surfaces of leaves and petioles. This symptom is characteristic of this group of diseases and lends it its name.
<http://ppathw3.cals.cornell.edu/PP644/ references.htm> (links to references on Oomycetes), http://www.arabidopsis.org/ (TAIR, The Arabidopsis Information Resource).
总结拟南芥霜霉病不是一种对重要作物具有巨大破坏性的疾病,也没有任何经济重要性。最明显的症状,气生分生孢子梗,可能,乍一看,可能会被误认为是叶子上通常存在的刚毛。然而,人们正在投入巨大的研究努力来研究这个卑微的病理系统,这个系统在 20 世纪 90 年代成为实验室模型。从那时起,在克隆和表征抗性的主要基因(RPP 基因)以及定义它们的许多下游信号成分方面取得了巨大进展,其中一些是 RPP 基因特异性的。抗性通常与氧化爆发和依赖水杨酸的过敏性细胞死亡类型的程序性细胞死亡有关。在早期就证明了生物和化学诱导拟南芥的全身性获得性抗性(SAR)可以预防霜霉病,对突变体的研究从根本上促进了我们对宿主-病原体相互作用和植物防御机制的理解。本综述将尝试汇集过去十年中该病理系统积累的大量信息,并通过提请注意一些仍未解决的问题来预测未来的研究方向。
拟南芥霜霉病菌 Constant。寄生菌(Pers.:Fr)Fr.(以前称为 Peronospora parasitica),属于 Chromista 王国、卵菌门、Peronosporales 目、Peronosporaceae 科、Hyaloperonospora 属,它是该属的模式种。引起 Brassica 霜霉病的生物体群的分类学经历了多次修订,自从 Corda(1837 年)最初创造了 Peronospora 属以来。所有致病性 Brassica 的分离物最初都被描述为 P. parasitica,但 Gäumann(1918 年)根据分生孢子的尺寸和宿主范围对来自不同 Brassicaceae 宿主的分离物进行了明显的分类,从而基于分生孢子的尺寸和宿主范围定义了 52 个新种。经过多次辩论,决定将所有 Brassica 侵染性霜霉病的 P. parasitica 归为一个聚合种,同时承认这些种存在一些种特异性差异(Yerkes 和 Shaw,1959)。最近由 Constantinescu 和 Fatehi(2002 年)对 P. parasitica 的重新检查将 P. parasitica 和其他五个霜霉病种的分离物放在一个明确的新亚组中,基于它们的透明分生孢子、弯曲的分生孢子梗分支尖端和 ITS1、ITS2 和 5.8S rDNA 序列比较;值得创造新属“Hyaloperonospora Constant”。Chromista 王国(Straminipila)中的卵菌门包括真菌样生物体,具有异鞭毛游动孢子(即具有两种类型的鞭毛,鞭毛和金属丝)。卵菌门具有非分隔的菌丝体,具有纤维素为基础的细胞壁,几乎不含或不含几丁质。后者被认为是将卵菌门与真正的真菌区分开来的主要区别,并且关于存在几丁质的报道通常被认为是由于少量污染(Gams 等人,1998)。然而,鉴于 Werner 等人最近的研究(2002 年)显示卵菌门中存在一种几丁质合酶基因,并通过与小麦胚芽凝集素(WGA)的相互作用证明了聚合物的存在,我们也许可以说我们还没有看到将影响这一群体的最后一次分类修订!卵菌门中的科显示出与水环境的绝对依赖性降低的明显进化趋势,例如,H. parasitica 在生命周期中没有游动孢子阶段。
感染拟南芥的分离物迄今为止已被证明对其他十字花科植物没有致病性,但与不同的宿主生态型存在明确的基因对基因关系。疾病症状:感染首先在肉眼下表现为覆盖叶片和叶柄上下表面的一层或“绒毛”状分生孢子梗。这种症状是该组疾病的特征,使其得名。
<http://ppathw3.cals.cornell.edu/PP644/ references.htm>(链接到卵菌门的参考文献),http://www.arabidopsis.org/(TAIR,拟南芥信息资源)。