Suppr超能文献

香料接触过敏:一项 4 年回顾性研究。

Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario, 03010 Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2010 Aug;63(2):77-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01739.x. Epub 2010 Jun 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fragrance chemicals are the second most frequent cause of contact allergy. The mandatory labelling of 26 fragrance chemicals when present in cosmetics has facilitated management of patients allergic to fragrances.

OBJECTIVES

The study was aimed to define the characteristics of the population allergic to perfumes detected in our hospital district, to determine the usefulness of markers of fragrance allergy in the baseline GEIDAC series, and to describe the contribution made by the fragrance series to the data obtained with the baseline series.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a 4-year retrospective study of patients tested with the Spanish baseline series and/or fragrance series. There are four fragrance markers in the baseline series: fragrance mix I (FM I), Myroxylon pereirae, fragrance mix II (FM II), and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde.

RESULTS

A total of 1253 patients were patch tested, 117 (9.3%) of whom were positive to a fragrance marker. FM I and M. pereirae detected 92.5% of the cases of fragrance contact allergy. FM II and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde detected 6 additional cases and provided further information in 8, enabling improved management. A fragrance series was tested in a selected group of 86 patients and positive results were obtained in 45.3%. Geraniol was the allergen most frequently found in the group of patients tested with the fragrance series.

CONCLUSIONS

Classic markers detect the majority of cases of fragrance contact allergy. We recommend incorporating FM II in the Spanish baseline series, as in the European baseline series, and using a specific fragrance series to study patients allergic to a fragrance marker.

摘要

背景

香料化学品是继接触过敏原第二常见的原因。当存在于化妆品中时,对 26 种香料化学品进行强制性标签标注,有助于管理对香料过敏的患者。

目的

本研究旨在定义我们医院区域内检测到的对香水过敏人群的特征,确定基线 GEIDAC 系列中香料过敏标志物的有用性,并描述香氛系列对基线系列获得的数据的贡献。

材料和方法

我们对使用西班牙基线系列和/或香氛系列进行测试的患者进行了 4 年的回顾性研究。基线系列中有四个香料标志物:香料混合物 I(FM I)、秘鲁香脂、香料混合物 II(FM II)和羟基异己基 3-环己烯甲醛。

结果

共对 1253 名患者进行了斑贴试验,其中 117 名(9.3%)对香料标志物呈阳性。FM I 和 M. pereirae 检测到 92.5%的香料接触过敏病例。FM II 和羟基异己基 3-环己烯甲醛检测到另外 6 例,并在 8 例中提供了更多信息,从而改善了管理。在 86 名选定的患者中进行了香氛系列测试,其中 45.3%的患者测试结果为阳性。香叶醇是在接受香氛系列测试的患者群体中最常发现的过敏原。

结论

经典标志物可检测到大多数香料接触过敏病例。我们建议在西班牙基线系列中纳入 FM II,就像在欧洲基线系列中一样,并使用特定的香氛系列来研究对香料标志物过敏的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验