Gardner Christopher D, Kim Soowon, Bersamin Andrea, Dopler-Nelson Mindy, Otten Jennifer, Oelrich Beibei, Cherin Rise
Stanford Prevention Research Center and Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Aug;92(2):304-12. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29468. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
Information on the micronutrient quality of alternative weight-loss diets is limited, despite the significant public health relevance.
Micronutrient intake was compared between overweight or obese women randomly assigned to 4 popular diets that varied primarily in macronutrient distribution.
Dietary data were collected from women in the Atkins (n = 73), Zone (n = 73), LEARN (Lifestyle, Exercise, Attitudes, Relationships, Nutrition) (n = 73), and Ornish (n = 72) diet groups by using 3-d, unannounced 24-h recalls at baseline and after 8 wk of instruction. Nutrient intakes were compared between groups at 8 wk and within groups for 8-wk changes in risk of micronutrient inadequacy.
At 8 wk, significant differences were observed between groups for all macronutrients and for many micronutrients (P < 0.0001). Energy intake decreased from baseline in all 4 groups but was similar between groups. At 8 wk, a significant proportion of individuals shifted to intakes associated with risk of inadequacy (P < 0.05) in the Atkins group for thiamine, folic acid, vitamin C, iron, and magnesium; in the LEARN group for vitamin E, thiamine, and magnesium; and in the Ornish group for vitamins E and B-12 and zinc. In contrast, for the Zone group, the risk of inadequacy significantly decreased for vitamins A, E, K, and C (P < 0.05), and no significant increases in risk of inadequacy were observed for other micronutrients.
Weight-loss diets that focus on macronutrient composition should attend to the overall quality of the diet, including the adequacy of micronutrient intakes. Concerning calorie-restricted diets, there may be a micronutrient advantage to diets providing moderately low carbohydrate amounts and that contain nutrient-dense foods.
尽管替代减肥饮食的微量营养素质量信息对公共卫生具有重大意义,但其相关信息有限。
比较随机分配到4种主要在宏量营养素分布上有所不同的流行饮食的超重或肥胖女性之间的微量营养素摄入量。
通过在基线和8周指导后使用3天、未事先通知的24小时饮食回顾法,收集阿特金斯饮食组(n = 73)、区域饮食组(n = 73)、LEARN(生活方式、运动、态度、人际关系、营养)饮食组(n = 73)和奥尼什饮食组(n = 72)女性的饮食数据。比较8周时各组之间以及组内8周微量营养素摄入不足风险的变化。
在8周时,所有宏量营养素和许多微量营养素在各组之间均观察到显著差异(P < 0.0001)。所有4组的能量摄入量均较基线下降,但各组之间相似。在8周时,阿特金斯组中相当一部分个体转向硫胺素、叶酸、维生素C、铁和镁摄入不足风险相关的摄入量(P < 0.05);LEARN组中转向维生素E、硫胺素和镁摄入不足风险相关的摄入量;奥尼什组中转向维生素E、维生素B - 12和锌摄入不足风险相关的摄入量。相比之下,区域饮食组中,维生素A、E、K和C摄入不足的风险显著降低(P < 0.05),其他微量营养素摄入不足风险未观察到显著增加。
关注宏量营养素组成的减肥饮食应关注饮食的整体质量,包括微量营养素摄入的充足性。关于热量限制饮食,提供适量低碳水化合物且包含营养丰富食物的饮食可能在微量营养素方面具有优势。