• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥散加权成像提高了常规 3.0-T 乳腺磁共振成像的诊断准确性。

Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health/Clinical Center and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Bethesda, Md, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):64-73. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091367.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.10091367
PMID:20574085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2897691/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incremental value of diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping in relation to conventional breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the characterization of benign versus malignant breast lesions at 3.0 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board, with the requirement for informed patient consent waived. Of 550 consecutive patients who underwent bilateral breast MR imaging over a 10-month period, 93 women with 101 lesions met the following study inclusion criteria: They had undergone three-dimensional (3D) high-spatial-resolution T1-weighted contrast material-enhanced MR imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and DW imaging examinations at 3.0 T and either had received a pathologic analysis-proven diagnosis (96 lesions) or had lesion stability confirmed at more than 2 years of follow-up (five lesions). DW images were acquired with b values of 0 and 600 sec/mm(2). Regions of interest were drawn on ADC maps of breast lesions and normal glandular tissue. Morphologic features (margin, enhancement pattern), dynamic contrast-enhanced MR results (semiquantitative kinetic curve data), absolute ADCs, and glandular tissue-normalized ADCs were included in multivariate models to predict a diagnosis of benign versus malignant lesion.

RESULTS

Forty-one (44%) of the 93 patients were premenopausal, and 52 (56%) were postmenopausal. Thirty-three (32.7%) of the 101 lesions were benign, and 68 (67.3%) were malignant. Normalized ADCs were significantly different between the benign (mean ADC, 1.1 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.4 [standard deviation]) and malignant (mean ADC, 0.55 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.16) lesions (P < .001). Adding normalized ADCs to the 3D T1-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR data improved the diagnostic performance of MR imaging: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve improved from 0.89 to 0.98, and the false-positive rate decreased from 36% (nine of 25 lesions) to 24% (six of 25 lesions).

CONCLUSION

DW imaging with glandular tissue-normalized ADC assessment improves the characterization of breast lesions beyond the characterization achieved with conventional 3D T1-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0 T.

摘要

目的

在 3.0T 磁共振成像(MR)中,评估扩散加权(DW)成像和表观扩散系数(ADC)图相对于常规乳腺 MR 成像在良、恶性乳腺病变鉴别中的附加价值。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究符合 HIPAA 规定,经机构审查委员会批准,无需患者知情同意。在 10 个月期间,对 550 例连续行双侧乳腺 MR 成像的患者进行研究,其中 93 例女性的 101 个病灶符合以下研究纳入标准:均行三维(3D)高空间分辨率 T1 加权对比增强 MR 成像、动态对比增强 MR 成像和 DW 成像检查,且均行病理分析证实(96 个病灶)或 2 年以上随访证实病变稳定(5 个病灶)。DW 成像采用 b 值为 0 和 600 sec/mm(2)。在 ADC 图上绘制乳腺病变和正常腺体组织的感兴趣区。形态特征(边缘、强化模式)、动态对比增强 MR 结果(半定量动力学曲线数据)、绝对 ADC 值和腺体组织归一化 ADC 值均纳入多变量模型以预测良性或恶性病变。

结果

93 例患者中,41 例(44%)为绝经前,52 例(56%)为绝经后。101 个病灶中,33 个(32.7%)为良性,68 个(67.3%)为恶性。良性病变的 ADC 值(平均值 1.1 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.4 [标准差])与恶性病变(平均值 0.55 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.16)之间存在显著差异(P <.001)。将 ADC 值归一化后纳入 3D T1 加权和动态对比增强 MR 数据可提高 MR 成像的诊断效能:受试者工作特征曲线下面积从 0.89 提高至 0.98,假阳性率从 36%(25 个病灶中的 9 个)降至 24%(25 个病灶中的 6 个)。

结论

在 3.0T,与常规 3D T1 加权和动态对比增强 MR 成像相比,DW 成像联合腺体组织 ADC 值评估可提高乳腺病变的特征性表现。

相似文献

1
Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.弥散加权成像提高了常规 3.0-T 乳腺磁共振成像的诊断准确性。
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):64-73. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091367.
2
T1 hyperintense renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.T1高信号肾病变:扩散加权磁共振成像与对比增强磁共振成像的特征对比
Radiology. 2009 Jun;251(3):796-807. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2513080724. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
3
Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.非恶性乳腺病变:在动态增强 MRI 评估中被误诊为阳性的良性和高危亚型的 ADC 值。
Radiology. 2012 Dec;265(3):696-706. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112672. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
4
3-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: pharmacokinetic parameters versus conventional kinetic curve analysis.3-T 动态对比增强磁共振成像在乳腺中的应用:药代动力学参数与常规动力学曲线分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec;197(6):1498-505. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4665.
5
Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study.表观扩散系数作为低危型导管原位癌的 MRI 成像生物标志物:一项初步研究。
Radiology. 2011 Aug;260(2):364-72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101892. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
6
Differentiation of malignant from benign pheochromocytomas with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance at 3.0 T.3.0T磁共振扩散加权成像与动态对比增强成像鉴别恶性与良性嗜铬细胞瘤
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Jul-Aug;36(4):361-6. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825975f8.
7
Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging.磁共振扩散加权成像对肝脏局灶性病变的检测与特征分析:与标准屏气T2加权成像的比较
Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):812-22. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2463070432. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
8
High-Resolution Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Sinonasal Magnetic Resonance Imaging.高分辨率扩散加权成像提高了动态对比增强鼻窦磁共振成像的诊断准确性。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Mar/Apr;41(2):199-205. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000502.
9
Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.肾脏病变:扩散加权成像与对比增强磁共振成像的特征对比
Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):398-407. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2512080880. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
10
In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters.乳腺磁共振动态对比增强及弥散加权成像参数在乳腺导管原位癌分级中的应用价值
Radiology. 2012 May;263(2):374-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111368.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced Detection of Residual Breast Cancer Post-Excisional Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI with and Without Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.切除活检后残余乳腺癌的增强检测:对比增强MRI联合与不联合扩散加权成像的对比分析
Tomography. 2025 Jan 20;11(1):10. doi: 10.3390/tomography11010010.
2
High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging compared with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with regard to image quality and assessment of breast cancer morphology.高分辨率弥散加权成像与常规弥散加权成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像在乳腺癌形态学评估方面的图像质量比较。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023 Mar 29;29(2):251-259. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.21362. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
3
Diagnostic Usefulness of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation in Patients with Breast Cancer.扩散加权磁共振成像在乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结评估中的诊断价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 31;13(3):513. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030513.
4
Identification of the Benignity and Malignancy of BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions Based on a Combined Quantitative Model of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion.基于动态对比增强 MRI 和体素内不相干运动的联合定量模型对 BI-RADS 4 乳腺病变的良恶性进行鉴定。
Tomography. 2022 Oct 31;8(6):2676-2686. doi: 10.3390/tomography8060223.
5
Development and validation of a deep learning model for breast lesion segmentation and characterization in multiparametric MRI.用于多参数磁共振成像中乳腺病变分割与特征分析的深度学习模型的开发与验证
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;12:946580. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.946580. eCollection 2022.
6
Value of magnetic resonance diffusion combined with perfusion imaging techniques for diagnosing potentially malignant breast lesions.磁共振扩散加权成像联合灌注成像技术在诊断乳腺潜在恶性病变中的价值
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jun 26;10(18):6021-6031. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.6021.
7
Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques.扩散加权乳腺磁共振成像:当前标准与新兴技术
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 8;12:844790. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.844790. eCollection 2022.
8
Assessment of breast lesions by the Kaiser score for differential diagnosis on MRI: the added value of ADC and machine learning modeling.基于 MRI 的 Kaiser 评分对乳腺病变的鉴别诊断评估:ADC 值和机器学习建模的附加价值。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Oct;32(10):6608-6618. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08899-w. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
9
Tumor Connectomics: Mapping the Intra-Tumoral Complex Interaction Network Using Machine Learning.肿瘤连接组学:使用机器学习绘制肿瘤内复杂相互作用网络
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 14;14(6):1481. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061481.
10
Differentiation Between Benign and Metastatic Breast Lymph Nodes Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficients.利用表观扩散系数鉴别乳腺良性和转移性淋巴结
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 23;12:795265. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.795265. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment.乳腺动态对比增强磁共振成像:动力学曲线类型评估的定量方法
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):W295-300. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2483.
2
Uncertainty in T(1) mapping using the variable flip angle method with two flip angles.使用具有两个翻转角的可变翻转角方法进行T(1)映射时的不确定性。
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jan 7;54(1):N1-8. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/N01. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
3
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.乳腺磁共振成像
Semin Roentgenol. 2008 Oct;43(4):265-81. doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2008.07.002.
4
Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer.3.0特斯拉与1.5特斯拉扩散加权成像在乳腺癌可见性方面的比较。
Radiat Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/s11604-007-0187-6. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
5
The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors.扩散加权成像及表观扩散系数(ADC)值在乳腺肿瘤中的作用。
Korean J Radiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;8(5):390-6. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.5.390.
6
Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences.乳腺MRI中的扩散加权成像:两种不同脉冲序列的比较
Acad Radiol. 2007 Sep;14(9):1077-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.006.
7
MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study.磁共振成像用于诊断纯导管原位癌:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Lancet. 2007 Aug 11;370(9586):485-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61232-X.
8
Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls.乳腺磁共振成像的强化模式:解读与成像陷阱
Radiographics. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):1719-34; quiz 1719. doi: 10.1148/rg.266065025.
9
Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study.乳腺癌的定量扩散成像:一项临床前瞻性研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Aug;24(2):319-24. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20643.
10
Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience.同一患者在3.0T和1.5T场强下的乳腺对比增强磁共振成像:初步经验
Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):666-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392050509. Epub 2006 Mar 20.