• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3.0特斯拉与1.5特斯拉扩散加权成像在乳腺癌可见性方面的比较。

Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer.

作者信息

Matsuoka Aoi, Minato Masako, Harada Masafumi, Kubo Hitoshi, Bandou Yoshikatsu, Tangoku Akira, Nakano Kiichirou, Nishitani Hiromu

机构信息

Nishitani Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, The University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima 770-8509, Japan.

出版信息

Radiat Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/s11604-007-0187-6. Epub 2008 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1007/s11604-007-0187-6
PMID:18236129
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 3.0 T and 1.5 T by evaluating the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and visibility of breast cancer in the same patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 13 patients (16 lesions) with breast cancer underwent DWI at 3.0 T and 1.5 T. Tumors were classified into two groups based on the lesion size. The ADC values were measured, and visibility of the tumors was scored blindly.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found for ADC values between 3.0 T and 1.5 T in either group (P > 0.05). All of the large lesions were visible clearly at both magnetic field strengths, and image scores were not different (P > 0.05). In contrast, small lesions were more clearly visible and had better image scores at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Small cancers were more clearly visible on DWI at 3.0 T than 1.5 T.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过评估同一患者乳腺癌的表观扩散系数(ADC)值和可视性,比较3.0 T和1.5 T磁共振扩散加权成像(DWI)。

材料与方法

13例(16个病灶)乳腺癌患者分别接受3.0 T和1.5 T的DWI检查。根据病灶大小将肿瘤分为两组。测量ADC值,并对肿瘤可视性进行盲法评分。

结果

两组中3.0 T和1.5 T的ADC值均无显著差异(P>0.05)。所有大病灶在两种磁场强度下均清晰可见,图像评分无差异(P>0.05)。相比之下,小病灶在3.0 T时比在1.5 T时更清晰可见,图像评分更高(P<0.001)。

结论

在DWI上,3.0 T时小癌灶比1.5 T时更清晰可见。

相似文献

1
Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer.3.0特斯拉与1.5特斯拉扩散加权成像在乳腺癌可见性方面的比较。
Radiat Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/s11604-007-0187-6. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
2
Assessment of tumor morphology on diffusion-weighted (DWI) breast MRI: Diagnostic value of reduced field of view DWI.扩散加权(DWI)乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)中肿瘤形态的评估:缩小视野DWI的诊断价值
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec;42(6):1656-65. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24929. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
3
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.体素内不相干运动(IVIM)在评估乳腺病变中的应用:与常规 DWI 的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e782-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
4
The role of parallel diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values for evaluating breast lesions: preliminary results.平行弥散加权成像和表观扩散系数(ADC)图值在评价乳腺病变中的作用:初步结果。
Acad Radiol. 2010 Apr;17(4):456-63. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.004.
5
Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.扩散加权成像和扩散张量成像中扩散参数对乳腺病变诊断性能的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
6
Fat suppression techniques (STIR vs. SPAIR) on diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions at 3.0 T: preliminary experience.3.0T下乳腺病变扩散加权成像的脂肪抑制技术(短TI反转恢复序列与频谱预饱和反转恢复序列):初步经验
Radiol Med. 2015 Aug;120(8):705-13. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0508-2. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
7
3-T breast diffusion-weighted MRI by echo-planar imaging with spectral spatial excitation or with additional spectral inversion recovery: an in vivo comparison of image quality.采用频谱空间激发或附加频谱反转恢复的回波平面成像进行3-T乳腺扩散加权磁共振成像:图像质量的体内比较
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 May-Jun;39(3):343-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000223.
8
Diffusion-weighted imaging: Effects of intravascular contrast agents on apparent diffusion coefficient measures of breast malignancies at 3 Tesla.扩散加权成像:血管内造影剂对3特斯拉下乳腺恶性肿瘤表观扩散系数测量值的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Sep;42(3):788-800. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24844. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
9
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping as a quantitative imaging biomarker for prediction of immunohistochemical receptor status, proliferation rate, and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.弥散加权成像(DWI)及其表观扩散系数(ADC)图作为一种定量影像学生物标志物,可预测乳腺癌的免疫组织化学受体状态、增殖率和分子亚型。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Sep;50(3):836-846. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26697. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Breast Cancer: Improved Lesion Visibility and Image Quality Using Synthetic b-Values.乳腺癌的弥散加权 MRI:使用合成 b 值提高病变可见度和图像质量。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Dec;50(6):1754-1761. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26809. Epub 2019 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in resectable pancreatic cancer: a new prognostic factor for biologically borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.可切除胰腺癌术前磁共振成像的最小表观扩散系数值:生物学上临界可切除胰腺癌的一个新的预后因素。
Surg Today. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03050-w.
2
Comparison of the fibrosis degree using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in chronic hepatitis cases.声辐射力脉冲弹性成像与磁共振弥散加权成像对慢性肝炎纤维化程度的比较。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Oct 6;69(8):e20221723. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20221723. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate cancer detection with 3-T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted imaging.3-T磁共振成像用于前列腺癌检测:弥散加权成像与T2加权成像的比较
Eur J Radiol. 2007 Feb;61(2):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
2
Imaging artifacts at 3.0T.3.0T磁共振成像伪影
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;24(4):735-46. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20698.
3
Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer.在乳腺癌新辅助治疗中,扩散变化先于肿瘤大小缩小。
Differentiation between pleomorphic adenoma and schwannoma in the parapharyngeal space: histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient.
咽旁间隙多形性腺瘤与神经鞘瘤的鉴别诊断:表观扩散系数直方图分析。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Oct;52(7):20230140. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230140. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient of two-dimensional BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging with a breast phantom.使用乳腺模型评估二维刀锋式涡轮梯度与自旋回波扩散加权成像的表观扩散系数
Radiol Phys Technol. 2023 Mar;16(1):118-126. doi: 10.1007/s12194-022-00694-y. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
5
With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen.采用 3 种呼吸采集方式:3.0T 呼吸触发采集可获得上腹部更高质量的 DWI 图像。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul 9;2022:9579145. doi: 10.1155/2022/9579145. eCollection 2022.
6
Relevance of diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression for staging, prognosis, morphology, treatment response, and apparent diffusion coefficient in plasma-cell neoplasms: A single-center, retrospective study.弥散加权成像联合背景抑制技术在浆细胞瘤分期、预后、形态学、治疗反应及表观弥散系数中的相关性:一项单中心回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253025. eCollection 2021.
7
CT and MRI in Urinary Tract Infections: A Spectrum of Different Imaging Findings.泌尿系统感染中的CT和MRI:一系列不同的影像学表现
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 1;57(1):32. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010032.
8
Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography.与对比增强计算机断层扫描相比,扩散加权磁共振成像在评估急性肾盂肾炎中的有效性。
Pol J Radiol. 2020 Mar 14;85:e137-e143. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2020.93669. eCollection 2020.
9
B-Value Optimization in the Estimation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Parameters in Patients with Cervical Cancer.在宫颈癌患者体素内不相干运动参数估计中 B 值的优化。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Feb;21(2):218-227. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0232.
10
Gadoterate meglumine decreases ADC values of breast lesions depending on the b value combination.钆特酸葡胺会根据 b 值组合降低乳腺病变的 ADC 值。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 8;8(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18035-0.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Sep;24(7):843-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.11.005. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
4
[MRI breast-cancer screening: particularly important in women at increased risk].[乳腺磁共振成像筛查:对高危女性尤为重要]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Jul 1;150(26):1449-53.
5
Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study.乳腺癌的定量扩散成像:一项临床前瞻性研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Aug;24(2):319-24. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20643.
6
Breast MRI as a screening tool: the appropriate role.乳腺磁共振成像作为一种筛查工具:恰当的作用。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006 May;4(5):523-6. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2006.0042.
7
Current role of magnetic resonance imaging in breast imaging: a primer for the primary care physician.磁共振成像在乳腺成像中的当前作用:基层医疗医生入门指南
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005 Nov-Dec;18(6):478-90. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.18.6.478.
8
Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension.乳腺恶性肿瘤的扩散加权成像:表观扩散系数(ADC)值及ADC图在乳腺恶性肿瘤检测及癌灶范围评估中的应用价值
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005 Sep-Oct;29(5):644-9. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000171913.74086.1b.
9
Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value.采用敏感性编码技术的乳腺癌扩散加权成像:表观扩散系数值分析
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2004 Jul 15;3(2):79-85. doi: 10.2463/mrms.3.79.
10
Elevation of plasma oxidized LDL in acute stroke patients is associated with ischemic lesions depicted by DWI and predictive of infarct enlargement.急性中风患者血浆氧化低密度脂蛋白水平升高与弥散加权成像(DWI)显示的缺血性病变相关,并可预测梗死灶扩大。
Neurol Res. 2005 Jan;27(1):94-102. doi: 10.1179/016164105X18395.