Biodynamics Center, Department of Health Sciences, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Savannah, Georgia, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Mar;25(3):634-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc22b8.
Despite little objective support, heel-raise exercises are commonly performed using varying foot positions in an attempt to alter medial (MG) and lateral (LG) gastrocnemius involvement. This investigation compared MG and LG activation during the concentric phase (CP) and eccentric phase (EP) of the heel-raise exercise using neutral (NE), internally rotated (IR), and externally rotated (ER) foot positions. Twenty healthy subjects (10 men, 10 women; age = 23.7 ± 3.1 years) with resistance training experience performed free-weight (130-135% body mass) heel-raise exercise on a 3.81-cm block. Surface electromyography activity was recorded during 10 repetitions of each foot position. Electromyography activity from 5 successful repetitions was normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction, ensemble averaged within phase (CP, EP), and the mean amplitude determined. Significant (p < 0.05) muscle-by-foot position interactions were revealed for both phases. The ER position prompted significantly greater MG activation than LG during both phases, whereas the IR position elicited significantly greater LG activation than MG. These data support the notion that altering foot position during heel-raise exercise will prompt varying degrees of MG and LG activation. Although this study cannot predict whether muscle-activation differences between foot positions will translate into greater training adaptations, it does provide some initial objective evidence upon which practitioners can base the selection of gastrocnemius exercises.
尽管缺乏客观支持,但人们仍普遍采用不同的足部姿势来进行跟腱抬高练习,试图改变内侧(MG)和外侧(LG)比目鱼肌的参与度。本研究比较了在跟腱抬高练习的向心阶段(CP)和离心阶段(EP)中,使用中立(NE)、内旋(IR)和外旋(ER)足部姿势时,MG 和 LG 的激活情况。20 名有抗阻训练经验的健康受试者(10 名男性,10 名女性;年龄=23.7±3.1 岁)在 3.81 厘米高的木块上进行自由重量(130-135%体重)跟腱抬高练习。在每种足部姿势下进行 10 次重复时,记录表面肌电图活动。将 5 次成功重复的肌电图活动归一化为最大自主等长收缩,在相位内(CP、EP)进行集合平均,并确定平均振幅。两个阶段都显示出肌电图活动与足部位置的显著(p<0.05)相互作用。在两个阶段中,ER 位置都比 LG 更能激活 MG,而 IR 位置则比 MG 更能激活 LG。这些数据支持这样一种观点,即在跟腱抬高练习中改变足部位置会引起 MG 和 LG 激活程度的不同。虽然这项研究不能预测足部位置之间的肌肉激活差异是否会转化为更大的训练适应,但它确实提供了一些初步的客观证据,从业者可以据此选择比目鱼肌练习。