Malagelada Carolina, Malagelada Juan-R
Digestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010 Aug;12(4):242-8. doi: 10.1007/s11894-010-0119-y.
After many decades debating whether the clinical manifestations of patients with functional digestive symptoms originate "in their minds" or "in their guts," arguments remain strong on both sides of the controversy. However, advances in understanding of gut physiology and pathophysiology, and persuasive evidence on the bidirectionality of the regulatory traffic between the enteric and central nervous systems, are helping to characterize clinical situations in which we can legitimately speak of gut dysfunction, as opposed to others where symptoms are not associated with apparent or detectable gut disturbances and may truly represent somatization of an affective disorder. In this review, we describe available clinically applicable technology, albeit in specialized clinical research units, that may be used to discern whether or not challenging patients have gut sensory or motor disturbances. The practical yield of applying such methods to diagnostic investigation may be substantial, because it establishes a plausible mechanism of disease that may be used in patient management and patient persuasion, to remove uncertainties and to prevent futile repetition of conventional diagnostic tests. By evolving from symptom analysis to mechanism-based diagnosis, our gastroenterology community may progress toward the goal of delivering the full diagnostic spectrum from altered morphology to disturbed function.
在数十年间围绕功能性消化症状患者的临床表现究竟源自“大脑”还是“肠道”展开争论后,争议双方的观点依然强硬。然而,对肠道生理和病理生理认识的进展,以及关于肠神经系统与中枢神经系统之间调节信息流双向性的有力证据,正有助于明确哪些临床情况可合理地认定为肠道功能障碍,哪些情况的症状与明显或可检测到的肠道紊乱无关,可能确实代表情感障碍的躯体化表现。在本综述中,我们描述了现有可用于临床的技术,尽管这些技术仅在专业临床研究单位使用,可用于辨别有挑战性的患者是否存在肠道感觉或运动障碍。将这些方法应用于诊断检查可能会有很大收获,因为它确立了一种合理的疾病机制,可用于患者管理和说服患者,消除不确定性,避免常规诊断检查的徒劳重复。通过从症状分析向基于机制的诊断转变,我们胃肠病学界可能朝着实现从形态改变到功能紊乱的全面诊断范围这一目标迈进。