Schwender D, Keller I, Klasing S, Madler C
Institut für Anästhesiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed. 1990 Dec;25(6):383-90.
Since intraoperative awareness is not infrequently observed under balanced anaesthetic regimens employing benzodiazepines for suppression of consciousness, we studied the effect of intravenous induction of general anaesthesia using the benzodiazepines midazolam, diazepam and flunitrazepam on mid-latency auditory evoked potentials and auditory evoked neuronal 30-40 Hz oscillation. Following informed consent in 30 patients scheduled for minor gynaecological procedures, anaesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.2-0.3 mg/kg b.w. i.v., group I n = 10), diazepam (0.3-0,4 mg/kg b.w., i.v., group II n = 10) or flunitrazepam (0.03-0.04 mg/kg b.w., i.v., group III n = 10). Auditory evoked potentials were recorded before, during and after induction of general anaesthesia on vertex (positive) and mastoides on both sides (negative). Auditory clicks were presented binaurally at 70 dBnHL with a frequency of 9.3 Hz. Using the electrodiagnostic system Pathfinder I (Nicolet), 1000 successive stimuli were averaged over a 100 ms poststimulus period and analysed off-line. Latencies of the peak V, Na, Pa were measured. By means of Fast-Fourier transformation-analysis corresponding power spectra were calculated to analyse energy portions of the AEP frequency components. In the awake state AEP showed an oscillatory component between 20 and 100 ms poststimulus latency. Corresponding power spectra indicated a predominant 30-40 Hz frequency. After induction of general anaesthesia using midazolam, diazepam and flunitrazepam, there was no increase in latencies of the peaks V, Na, Pa, but only a small decrease in amplitudes Na/Pa without statistical significance. The auditory evoked mid-latency neuronal oscillation persisted under induction of general anaesthesia with midazolam, diazepam, flunitrazepam.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
由于在使用苯二氮䓬类药物抑制意识的平衡麻醉方案下,术中知晓并不罕见,我们研究了使用苯二氮䓬类药物咪达唑仑、地西泮和氟硝西泮进行静脉全身麻醉诱导对中潜伏期听觉诱发电位和听觉诱发神经元30 - 40Hz振荡的影响。在30例计划进行小型妇科手术的患者获得知情同意后,分别用咪达唑仑(0.2 - 0.3mg/kg体重,静脉注射,I组n = 10)、地西泮(0.3 - 0.4mg/kg体重,静脉注射,II组n = 10)或氟硝西泮(0.03 - 0.04mg/kg体重,静脉注射,III组n = 10)诱导麻醉。在全身麻醉诱导前、诱导期间和诱导后,记录头顶(正极)和双侧乳突(负极)的听觉诱发电位。双耳以70dBnHL、9.3Hz的频率呈现听觉点击声。使用Pathfinder I电诊断系统(尼高力公司),在刺激后100ms期间对1000个连续刺激进行平均,并离线分析。测量V波、Na波、Pa波的潜伏期。通过快速傅里叶变换分析计算相应的功率谱,以分析听觉诱发电位频率成分的能量部分。在清醒状态下,听觉诱发电位在刺激后潜伏期20至100ms之间显示出振荡成分。相应的功率谱表明主要频率为30 - 40Hz。使用咪达唑仑、地西泮和氟硝西泮诱导全身麻醉后,V波、Na波、Pa波的潜伏期没有增加,但Na/Pa波幅仅略有下降,无统计学意义。在使用咪达唑仑、地西泮、氟硝西泮诱导全身麻醉期间,听觉诱发的中潜伏期神经元振荡持续存在。(摘要截短至250字)