Sandooram Dosh, Hornigold Rachael, Grunfeld Beth, Thomas Nicholas, Kitchen Neil D, Gleeson Michael
Department of Otolaryngology and Skull Base Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Skull Base. 2010 Jan;20(1):47-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242985.
With the emergence of three effective management options for vestibular schwannoma and the drastic reduction in mortality rate, the last two decades have seen increasing attention being paid to health-related quality of life. The vast majority of quality of life studies have been retrospective. We prospectively assessed quality of life of vestibular schwannoma patients before and after conservative or microsurgical management. We performed a prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary referral center between October 2001 and October 2003. Patients were divided into two groups: conservative management and microsurgery. Quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). The questionnaires were administered at initial assessment, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months in both groups. Thirty-three patients completed the study, 18 in the conservative group and 15 in the microsurgical group. One month after microsurgery, SF-36 scores were significantly reduced within three of eight domains; however, 3 months after microsurgery, no significant difference existed in patients' scores on any of the SF-36 domains compared with preoperatively, and at 6 months there was a significant improvement in one domain compared with preoperatively. There was no significant difference in overall quality of life alteration (GBI total score) between microsurgery and conservative management. The improved quality of life of patients 6 months after microsurgery (relative to preoperatively, and in comparison with an age- and sex- matched population) is a new finding that has not been previously documented in the literature.
随着前庭神经鞘瘤三种有效治疗方案的出现以及死亡率的大幅降低,在过去二十年中,与健康相关的生活质量受到了越来越多的关注。绝大多数生活质量研究都是回顾性的。我们前瞻性地评估了前庭神经鞘瘤患者在保守治疗或显微手术后的生活质量。我们于2001年10月至2003年10月在一家三级转诊中心进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。患者分为两组:保守治疗组和显微手术组。使用医学结局研究简明健康调查问卷(SF - 36)和格拉斯哥获益量表(GBI)评估生活质量。两组患者均在初始评估、1个月、3个月和6个月时进行问卷调查。33名患者完成了研究,其中保守治疗组18例,显微手术组15例。显微手术后1个月,SF - 36评分在八个领域中的三个领域显著降低;然而,显微手术后3个月,患者在任何SF - 36领域的评分与术前相比均无显著差异,而在6个月时,与术前相比有一个领域有显著改善。显微手术和保守治疗在总体生活质量改变(GBI总分)方面没有显著差异。显微手术后6个月患者生活质量的改善(相对于术前,以及与年龄和性别匹配的人群相比)是一个新发现,此前文献中尚未有记载。