Arizona State University College of Nursing and Healthcare Innovation, 500 N 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2010 Jul-Aug;24(6):e1-e25. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.081013-LIT-248.
Research examining psychological and physiological benefits of Qigong and Tai Chi is growing rapidly. The many practices described as Qigong or Tai Chi have similar theoretical roots, proposed mechanisms of action, and expected benefits. Research trials and reviews, however, treat them as separate targets of examination. This review examines the evidence for achieving outcomes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of both.
The key words Tai Chi, Taiji, Tai Chi Chuan, and Qigong were entered into electronic search engines for the Cumulative Index for Allied Health and Nursing (CINAHL), psychological literature (PsycINFO), PubMed, Cochrane database, and Google Scholar. STUDY INCLUSION CRITERIA: RCTs reporting on the results of Qigong or Tai Chi interventions and published in peer-reviewed journals from 1993 to 2007.
Country, type and duration of activity, number/type of subjects, control conditions, and reported outcomes were recorded for each study.
Outcomes related to Qigong and Tai Chi practice were identified and evaluated.
Seventy-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. The nine outcome category groupings that emerged were bone density (n = 4), cardiopulmonary effects (n = 19), physical function (n = 16), falls and related risk factors (n = 23), quality of life (n = 17), self-efficacy (n = 8), patient-reported outcomes (n = 13), psychological symptoms (n = 27), and immune function (n = 6).
Research has demonstrated consistent, significant results for a number of health benefits in RCTs, evidencing progress toward recognizing the similarity and equivalence of Qigong and Tai Chi.
研究气功和太极拳的心理和生理益处的研究正在迅速发展。许多被描述为气功或太极拳的练习具有相似的理论基础、提出的作用机制和预期的益处。然而,研究试验和综述将它们视为单独的检查目标。本综述检查了来自随机对照试验(RCT)的证据。
将“Tai Chi”、“Taiji”、“Tai Chi Chuan”和“Qigong”等关键词输入电子搜索引擎,如 Cumulative Index for Allied Health and Nursing(CINAHL)、心理文献(PsycINFO)、PubMed、Cochrane 数据库和 Google Scholar。
报告气功或太极拳干预结果并在同行评议期刊上发表的 RCT,时间为 1993 年至 2007 年。
记录了每项研究的国家、活动类型和持续时间、受试者数量/类型、对照条件和报告结果。
确定并评估了与气功和太极拳实践相关的结果。
有 77 篇文章符合纳入标准。出现的九个结果类别分组是骨密度(n = 4)、心肺效应(n = 19)、身体功能(n = 16)、跌倒和相关危险因素(n = 23)、生活质量(n = 17)、自我效能(n = 8)、患者报告的结果(n = 13)、心理症状(n = 27)和免疫功能(n = 6)。
研究在 RCT 中证明了许多健康益处的一致、显著结果,证明了在认识气功和太极拳的相似性和等效性方面取得了进展。