Willis D, Barry P
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010 Jun;54(3):249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02165.x.
Clinical audiovisual interventions were implemented to avoid the use of general anaesthesia with children undergoing radiation therapy treatment. A retrospective audit and case study review was conducted to evaluate the utility of distraction interventions aimed at improving immobilisation and reducing separation anxiety for children aged between 2 and 6 years old who received radiation therapy. A simple, inexpensive audiovisual system was established using commercially available equipment. Paediatric patients could elect to (i) use a closed-circuit TV system that allowed them to see their carer(s); (ii) watch a DVD movie; or (iii) listen to carer(s) on a microphone during their treatment. Over a 2-year period (March 2007-May 2009), 37 paediatric patients aged 2-6 years received radiation therapy at the centre. Twenty-four children participated in audiovisual interventions, and 92% (n = 22) of these children did not require the use of general anaesthesia for some or all of their treatment. Case study review illustrates the utility and limitations of the system. The audit and case studies suggest that the audiovisual interventions provided supportive care and reduced the need to anaesthetise children undergoing radiation therapy treatment.
实施临床视听干预措施,以避免对接受放射治疗的儿童使用全身麻醉。进行了一项回顾性审计和案例研究审查,以评估分心干预措施的效用,这些措施旨在改善2至6岁接受放射治疗儿童的固定情况并减少分离焦虑。使用市售设备建立了一个简单、廉价的视听系统。儿科患者可以选择:(i)使用闭路电视系统,以便他们能看到自己的护理人员;(ii)观看DVD电影;或(iii)在治疗期间通过麦克风听取护理人员的声音。在2年期间(2007年3月至2009年5月),37名2至6岁的儿科患者在该中心接受了放射治疗。24名儿童参与了视听干预,其中92%(n = 22)的儿童在部分或全部治疗过程中不需要使用全身麻醉。案例研究审查说明了该系统的效用和局限性。审计和案例研究表明,视听干预提供了支持性护理,并减少了对接受放射治疗儿童进行麻醉的必要性。